Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

runningboardwarehouse.com

Nerf Bars & Running Boards | RealTruck

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

83 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

327 ms

runningboardwarehouse.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Running Boardwarehouse content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about runningboardwarehouse.com

Easily climb in and out of your truck with our Nerf Bars, Running Boards, and other Truck Steps. Choose options like electric, wheel-to-wheel, and more at RealTruck.

Visit runningboardwarehouse.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Runningboardwarehouse.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Runningboardwarehouse.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

runningboardwarehouse.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,940 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runningboardwarehouse.com

83 ms

www.runningboardwarehouse.com

406 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

120 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.js

150 ms

json2.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Runningboardwarehouse.com, 7% (9 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Shopperapproved.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Runningboardwarehouse.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (36%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Runningboardwarehouse.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

  • Original 62.5 kB
  • After minification 55.3 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 806.0 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Running Boardwarehouse needs image optimization as it can save up to 806.0 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 397.9 kB

  • Original 744.2 kB
  • After minification 666.0 kB
  • After compression 346.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.9 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runningboardwarehouse.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (38%)

Requests Now

112

After Optimization

69

The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Running Boardwarehouse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

runningboardwarehouse.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

runningboardwarehouse.com best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

runningboardwarehouse.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runningboardwarehouse.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runningboardwarehouse.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Running Boardwarehouse. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: