Tools & Wizards About Us
runningraw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

runningraw.com

Tim VanOrden's Running Raw Project - Home

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

109 ms

Resources Loaded

662 ms

Page Rendered

362 ms

runningraw.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to runningraw.com homepage info - get ready to check Running Raw best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about runningraw.com

Visit runningraw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Runningraw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runningraw.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runningraw.com

109 ms

style.css

52 ms

show_ads.js

4 ms

ga.js

5 ms

RRBanner.jpg

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Runningraw.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (269 ms) relates to the external source Audibletrack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

794.3 kB

After Optimization

724.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Runningraw.com main page is 794.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 727.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 18.0 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 727.2 kB
  • After minification 682.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Running Raw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 42.3 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runningraw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (22%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Running Raw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

runningraw.com

runningraw.com

109 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

4 ms

ga.js

ga.js

5 ms

RRBanner.jpg

RRBanner.jpg

184 ms

impression.track

impression.track

269 ms

ca-pub-6393498801122490.js

ca-pub-6393498801122490.js

68 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

169 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

57 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

207 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

FruitFirst.jpg

FruitFirst.jpg

238 ms

FeetHat.jpg

FeetHat.jpg

232 ms

Tech_Collage.jpg

Tech_Collage.jpg

206 ms

TC_audiobook_small.jpg

TC_audiobook_small.jpg

153 ms

google-plus-icon.png

google-plus-icon.png

152 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

196 ms

twitter-button.png

twitter-button.png

196 ms

youtube.jpg

youtube.jpg

196 ms

strava.jpg

strava.jpg

209 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

198 ms

ads

ads

218 ms

osd.js

osd.js

52 ms

ads

ads

253 ms

ads

ads

239 ms

070215_468x60_Sci-fi.jpg

070215_468x60_Sci-fi.jpg

6 ms

abg.js

abg.js

30 ms

16492755349931135507

16492755349931135507

16 ms

s

s

11 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

13 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

53 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

45 ms

7368894714982752493

7368894714982752493

39 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

8 ms

Accessibility Review

runningraw.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

runningraw.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

runningraw.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runningraw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Runningraw.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

runningraw.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Running Raw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: