Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

runningrestaurants.com

Restaurant Management for Restaurant Owners, Chefs, Managers & Staff

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

661 ms

runningrestaurants.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Running Restaurant S content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about runningrestaurants.com

Restaurant management resources on restaurant marketing, pr, restaurant service, restaurant operations and more for restaurant owners, chef & managers to be more profitable and successful

Visit runningrestaurants.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Runningrestaurants.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runningrestaurants.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,050 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.422

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runningrestaurants.com

212 ms

plone.css

9 ms

subHub.css

15 ms

template.css

17 ms

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Runningrestaurants.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Restaurantreport.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-ec.viddler.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (212 ms) belongs to the original domain Runningrestaurants.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 272.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

832.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Runningrestaurants.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 758.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 40.5 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 758.1 kB
  • After minification 733.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Running Restaurant S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 55.0 kB

  • Original 98.2 kB
  • After minification 82.7 kB
  • After compression 43.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 151.9 kB

  • Original 198.4 kB
  • After minification 175.6 kB
  • After compression 46.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runningrestaurants.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (52%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Running Restaurant S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

runningrestaurants.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

runningrestaurants.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

runningrestaurants.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runningrestaurants.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runningrestaurants.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Running Restaurant S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: