Tools & Wizards About Us
runticket.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

runticket.net

亚博vip手机网页版·(官网)登录

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

188 ms

Resources Loaded

635 ms

Page Rendered

229 ms

runticket.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Runticket content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about runticket.net

Visit runticket.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Runticket.net page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 864 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runticket.net performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runticket.net

188 ms

style.css

36 ms

welcome.jpg

167 ms

bg.jpg

45 ms

gadgets.jpg

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Runticket.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (194 ms) belongs to the original domain Runticket.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 kB (2%)

Content Size

90.5 kB

After Optimization

88.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Runticket.net main page is 90.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 87.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 826 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 242 B, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 81 B

  • Original 87.0 kB
  • After minification 87.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Runticket images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 934 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 602 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runticket.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 934 B or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Runticket. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

runticket.net

runticket.net

188 ms

style.css

style.css

36 ms

welcome.jpg

welcome.jpg

167 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

45 ms

gadgets.jpg

gadgets.jpg

194 ms

att_img.jpg

att_img.jpg

61 ms

Accessibility Review

runticket.net accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

runticket.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

runticket.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runticket.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Runticket.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

runticket.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Runticket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: