4.5 sec in total
641 ms
3.7 sec
181 ms
Click here to check amazing Rutze content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rutze.com
Visit rutze.comWe analyzed Rutze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 641 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rutze.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value390 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
641 ms
76 ms
119 ms
122 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Rutze.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rutze.com.
Page size can be reduced by 6.1 MB (49%)
12.4 MB
6.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rutze.com main page is 12.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rutze needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.5 MB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 326.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 278.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rutze.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 278.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (82%)
72
13
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rutze. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rutze.com
641 ms
system.base.css
76 ms
system.menus.css
119 ms
system.messages.css
122 ms
system.theme.css
119 ms
flexslider.css
135 ms
flexslider_img.css
160 ms
aggregator.css
136 ms
book.css
182 ms
colorbox_node.css
184 ms
comment.css
189 ms
field.css
205 ms
node.css
200 ms
om_maximenu.css
246 ms
poll.css
265 ms
search.css
243 ms
user.css
252 ms
forum.css
263 ms
views.css
278 ms
ckeditor.css
307 ms
colorbox_style.css
348 ms
ctools.css
330 ms
megamenu.css
332 ms
megamenu-skins.css
345 ms
nice_menus.css
355 ms
nice_menus_default.css
369 ms
panels.css
394 ms
twitter_db.css
400 ms
views_slideshow.css
410 ms
tweets.css
434 ms
esteem.css
438 ms
esteem-media.css
436 ms
jquery.min.js
541 ms
jquery.once.js
488 ms
drupal.js
514 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
525 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
520 ms
ajax.js
454 ms
jquery_update.js
458 ms
media_colorbox.js
470 ms
om_maximenu.js
485 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
502 ms
colorbox.js
486 ms
colorbox_style.js
456 ms
colorbox_load.js
442 ms
megamenu.js
471 ms
superfish.js
502 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
492 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
502 ms
nice_menus.js
451 ms
panels.js
455 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
541 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
1638 ms
superfish.js
1631 ms
supersubs.js
1619 ms
supposition.js
1572 ms
sftouchscreen.js
1575 ms
twitter_db.js
528 ms
views_slideshow.js
592 ms
flexslider.load.js
656 ms
flexslider_views_slideshow.js
716 ms
progress.js
776 ms
colorbox_node.js
831 ms
esteem.js
898 ms
Vvnxj3CYYKc
118 ms
se.png
136 ms
befound.png
556 ms
google.png
1079 ms
mobilevsdesktobn_0.png
797 ms
mobilebusinesses2.png
848 ms
mobilevsdesktop.png
877 ms
facebook%20%281%29.png
200 ms
twitter%20%281%29.png
265 ms
youtube_03.png
325 ms
marker.png
390 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
479 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
31 ms
www-embed-player.js
44 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
41 ms
ad_status.js
35 ms
rutze.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rutze.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rutze.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rutze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rutze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rutze.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rutze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: