Tools & Wizards About Us
rvptracker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 30

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

970 ms in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

655 ms

Page Rendered

134 ms

rvptracker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rvptracker.com now to see the best up-to-date Rvptracker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rvptracker.com

Visit rvptracker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rvptracker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 789 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rvptracker.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value35.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.revupmedia.com

181 ms

styles_n.css

35 ms

WhiteBK_Revised.jpg

70 ms

navbarFull.jpg

333 ms

spacer.gif

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rvptracker.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (333 ms) relates to the external source Revupmedia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

734.0 kB

After Optimization

677.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rvptracker.com main page is 734.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 716.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 9.9 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 42.6 kB

  • Original 716.3 kB
  • After minification 673.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rvptracker images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rvptracker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rvptracker. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.revupmedia.com

www.revupmedia.com

181 ms

styles_n.css

styles_n.css

35 ms

WhiteBK_Revised.jpg

WhiteBK_Revised.jpg

70 ms

navbarFull.jpg

navbarFull.jpg

333 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

107 ms

new_nav_r1_c1.png

new_nav_r1_c1.png

109 ms

home_s2.png

home_s2.png

108 ms

publishers.png

publishers.png

107 ms

advertisers.png

advertisers.png

106 ms

about.png

about.png

142 ms

contact.png

contact.png

142 ms

login.png

login.png

141 ms

list_management.png

list_management.png

142 ms

affiliate.png

affiliate.png

142 ms

new_nav_r10_c1.png

new_nav_r10_c1.png

175 ms

RUM_Index_Left.jpg

RUM_Index_Left.jpg

175 ms

RUM_Index_BtmRule.jpg

RUM_Index_BtmRule.jpg

175 ms

NewSection.jpg

NewSection.jpg

212 ms

RUM_Footer_Home.jpg

RUM_Footer_Home.jpg

240 ms

Accessibility Review

rvptracker.com accessibility score

30

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rvptracker.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rvptracker.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rvptracker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rvptracker.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rvptracker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rvptracker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: