Tools & Wizards About Us
selector.r4.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

selector.r4.com

Banco de inversión en España | Renta 4

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

618 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

selector.r4.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Selector R 4 content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about selector.r4.com

Somos un banco español especializado en servicios de inversión, gestión patrimonial y mercados de capitales para los que no se conforman.

Visit selector.r4.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Selector.r4.com page load time and found that the first response time was 618 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

selector.r4.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,680 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.r4.com

618 ms

box24.css

195 ms

estilos.css

303 ms

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

503 ms

jquery.validationEngine-min.js

318 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Selector.r4.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (912 ms) relates to the external source R4.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 382.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

862.9 kB

After Optimization

480.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Selector.r4.com main page is 862.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 63.3 kB
  • After minification 56.4 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 399.3 kB
  • After minification 377.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Selector R 4 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 151.2 kB
  • After minification 139.4 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 220.4 kB

  • Original 249.1 kB
  • After minification 201.2 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selector.r4.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 220.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Selector R 4. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.r4.com

www.r4.com

618 ms

box24.css

box24.css

195 ms

estilos.css

estilos.css

303 ms

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

503 ms

jquery.validationEngine-min.js

jquery.validationEngine-min.js

318 ms

r4.js

r4.js

320 ms

jquery-cookie.js

jquery-cookie.js

318 ms

jquery-anythingslider-plugin-min.js

jquery-anythingslider-plugin-min.js

318 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

399 ms

desconex.js

desconex.js

368 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

113 ms

back_top.gif

back_top.gif

100 ms

logorenta4banco2.gif

logorenta4banco2.gif

106 ms

telefono_r4.gif

telefono_r4.gif

102 ms

iconos.png

iconos.png

104 ms

icon_cartera.gif

icon_cartera.gif

104 ms

backgroundoptionsfade.png

backgroundoptionsfade.png

108 ms

home.png

home.png

197 ms

caja_buscar_peque.gif

caja_buscar_peque.gif

201 ms

input_buscar.gif

input_buscar.gif

203 ms

icon_facebook16.jpg

icon_facebook16.jpg

197 ms

icon_twitter16.jpg

icon_twitter16.jpg

199 ms

icon_googleplus16.jpg

icon_googleplus16.jpg

198 ms

icon_youtube16.jpg

icon_youtube16.jpg

289 ms

columna_gris.gif

columna_gris.gif

300 ms

input_buscador.png

input_buscador.png

295 ms

boton_buscador.png

boton_buscador.png

298 ms

top_cotizaciones.gif

top_cotizaciones.gif

302 ms

back_lista_cotizaciones.jpg

back_lista_cotizaciones.jpg

299 ms

220161766452INDIND.I.gif

220161766452INDIND.I.gif

386 ms

220161766452prima_riesgo.gif

220161766452prima_riesgo.gif

384 ms

boton_aplicacion.jpg

boton_aplicacion.jpg

381 ms

candado.png

candado.png

380 ms

gris-t-5cnew.png

gris-t-5cnew.png

381 ms

ampliar_reducir_gris.gif

ampliar_reducir_gris.gif

381 ms

boton_right.gif

boton_right.gif

462 ms

boton_left.gif

boton_left.gif

473 ms

gris-b-5c.png

gris-b-5c.png

473 ms

red-t-5c.png

red-t-5c.png

471 ms

ampliar_reducir_red.gif

ampliar_reducir_red.gif

472 ms

light-m-pruebanos2.png

light-m-pruebanos2.png

471 ms

boton_abrircuenta_grande.png

boton_abrircuenta_grande.png

559 ms

boton_pruebanos_peque.png

boton_pruebanos_peque.png

568 ms

red-b-5c.png

red-b-5c.png

569 ms

boton_slowfinance.jpg

boton_slowfinance.jpg

572 ms

destacados-t-5c.png

destacados-t-5c.png

570 ms

prueba_aspa.png

prueba_aspa.png

549 ms

icoflechamenu.png

icoflechamenu.png

595 ms

rs_facebook_bn.gif

rs_facebook_bn.gif

601 ms

rs_twiter_bn.gif

rs_twiter_bn.gif

600 ms

rs_googleplus_bn.gif

rs_googleplus_bn.gif

600 ms

rs_youtube_bn.gif

rs_youtube_bn.gif

598 ms

pensiones_renta4_acciones.jpg

pensiones_renta4_acciones.jpg

899 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

55 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

63 ms

pensiones_renta4_dedalo.jpg

pensiones_renta4_dedalo.jpg

799 ms

banner_horme_r4directo.gif

banner_horme_r4directo.gif

910 ms

banner-home-derivados.jpg

banner-home-derivados.jpg

911 ms

banner_home_etfs_2016.gif

banner_home_etfs_2016.gif

912 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

39 ms

Accessibility Review

selector.r4.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

selector.r4.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

selector.r4.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selector.r4.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Selector.r4.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

selector.r4.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Selector R 4. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: