Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

w3.racc.cat

Assegurances i Assistència a preu únic | Club de Mobilitat RACC

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

552 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

342 ms

w3.racc.cat screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing W 3 RACC content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about w3.racc.cat

Descobreix la nostra assistència a la carretera o les nostres assegurances. Cuidem de tu i dels teus. Fes-te del RACC! | Club de Mobilitat RACC

Visit w3.racc.cat

Key Findings

We analyzed W3.racc.cat page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

w3.racc.cat performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

w3.racc.cat

552 ms

index.php

111 ms

home_ca

1267 ms

all-public.css

674 ms

carousel.css

327 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original W3.racc.cat, 74% (49 requests) were made to Racc.cat and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Racc.cat.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.7 kB (51%)

Content Size

114.2 kB

After Optimization

55.5 kB

In fact, the total size of W3.racc.cat main page is 114.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 257 B
  • After minification 257 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W 3 RACC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 49.2 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 681 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 939 B
  • After compression 346 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. W3.racc.cat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 681 B or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (55%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W 3 RACC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

w3.racc.cat accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

w3.racc.cat best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

w3.racc.cat SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    CA

  • Language Claimed

    CA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise W3.racc.cat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Catalan is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that W3.racc.cat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of W 3 RACC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: