7.7 sec in total
2.7 sec
4.7 sec
298 ms
Click here to check amazing 2016 Semantics content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2016.semantics.cc
Visit 2016.semantics.ccWe analyzed 2016.semantics.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
2016.semantics.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
2664 ms
130 ms
228 ms
240 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original 2016.semantics.cc, 11% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 10% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain 2016.semantics.cc.
Page size can be reduced by 992.7 kB (46%)
2.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of 2016.semantics.cc main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 918.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2016 Semantics images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 642.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 642.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 271.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2016.semantics.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 271.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (60%)
102
41
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2016 Semantics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2016.semantics.cc
2664 ms
system.base.css
130 ms
system.menus.css
228 ms
system.messages.css
240 ms
system.theme.css
241 ms
calendar_multiday.css
370 ms
comment.css
252 ms
date.css
287 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
339 ms
field.css
359 ms
node.css
360 ms
search.css
379 ms
user.css
430 ms
views.css
451 ms
ckeditor.css
476 ms
ctools.css
479 ms
rate.css
492 ms
anonymous_publishing.css
502 ms
animate.css
866 ms
md-slider.css
676 ms
md-slider-style.css
595 ms
eu_cookie_compliance.css
598 ms
font-awesome.css
613 ms
bootstrap.min.css
9 ms
superfish.css
625 ms
style.css
832 ms
colors.css
716 ms
local.css
736 ms
jquery.js
1001 ms
jquery.once.js
786 ms
drupal.js
954 ms
jquery.touchwipe.js
859 ms
modernizr.js
899 ms
jquery.easing.js
952 ms
md-slider.js
986 ms
googleanalytics.js
1024 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
1026 ms
sfsmallscreen.js
1071 ms
supposition.js
958 ms
superfish.js
898 ms
supersubs.js
898 ms
superfish.js
924 ms
eu_cookie_compliance.js
891 ms
css
24 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
collect
14 ms
embed
299 ms
logo-semantics-16.png
137 ms
abendstimmung___skyline_von_leipzig_12331.jpg
729 ms
logo-semantics-16_1.png
137 ms
papers.jpg
139 ms
ACM.png
135 ms
240_F_89893292_WzrtxAtTC9zR791T0EUJWjYB9obzgtm2.jpg
137 ms
UniLeipzig_Andreas%20Schmidt_2.png
508 ms
Bildschirmfoto%202015-09-24%20um%2017.31.33.png
382 ms
ELDC.jpg
253 ms
pattern.png
242 ms
feed.png
255 ms
semalytix.png
381 ms
logo-eccenca.png.small_.png
381 ms
logo-www.leds-projekt.png
381 ms
poolparty-logo_ks.png
506 ms
logo.png
525 ms
stanford%20logo.png
523 ms
large.png
523 ms
imgres-2.png
653 ms
cache_1953566180ee.png
627 ms
gfwm_02.jpg
653 ms
imgres.png
652 ms
UniLogo.png
651 ms
fhstplt.png
738 ms
infai.png
761 ms
swc_logo2.png
759 ms
md-arrow.png
666 ms
2HG_tEPiQ4Z6795cGfdivKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
11 ms
gc5ZVKiLNkRdGlU3GaSVBfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
27 ms
LqowQDslGv4DmUBAfWa2Vw.ttf
11 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
25 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
27 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
25 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
26 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
3 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
667 ms
js
52 ms
init_embed.js
35 ms
common.js
40 ms
map.js
51 ms
google4.png
72 ms
overlay.js
22 ms
util.js
78 ms
onion.js
88 ms
search_impl.js
87 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
256 ms
stats.js
57 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
53 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
131 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
48 ms
kh
90 ms
transparent.png
44 ms
controls.js
18 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
39 ms
css
86 ms
entity11.png
34 ms
mapcnt6.png
17 ms
tmapctrl.png
31 ms
vt
139 ms
vt
136 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
114 ms
vt
112 ms
vt
135 ms
vt
193 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
26 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
2016.semantics.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
2016.semantics.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
2016.semantics.cc SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2016.semantics.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2016.semantics.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2016.semantics.cc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2016 Semantics. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: