5.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.1 sec
112 ms
Welcome to eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id homepage info - get ready to check E Proposal Sinarmas MSIG Life best content for Indonesia right away, or after learning these important things about eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id
Buat Proposal secara online!
Visit eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.idWe analyzed Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
1072 ms
791 ms
537 ms
1074 ms
537 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id.
Page size can be reduced by 140.0 kB (85%)
165.4 kB
25.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id main page is 165.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 124.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (21%)
29
23
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Proposal Sinarmas MSIG Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wepr01010101.htm
1072 ms
general.css
791 ms
links.js
537 ms
general.js
1074 ms
dateOperation.js
537 ms
calendar-win2k-1.css
819 ms
calendar.js
1656 ms
calendar-en.js
819 ms
calendar-setup.js
1070 ms
overlib.js
1600 ms
ajs_new_logo.gif
274 ms
bor-log-top-lef.gif
280 ms
bor-log-top-cen.gif
276 ms
bor-log-top-rig.gif
280 ms
bor-log-cen-lef.gif
278 ms
blank.gif
278 ms
bor-log-cen-rig.gif
537 ms
logo_login.gif
546 ms
bor-log-top-cen-box.gif
545 ms
bor-log-top-rig-box.gif
548 ms
bor-log-cen-lef-box.gif
545 ms
bor-log-in-the-box.gif
547 ms
ok.gif
805 ms
bor-log-bot-lef-box.gif
809 ms
bor-log-bot-cen-box.gif
808 ms
bor-log-bot-rig-box.gif
815 ms
bor-log-ajs-info.gif
816 ms
bor-log-bot-lef.gif
815 ms
bor-log-bot-cen.gif
1073 ms
bor-log-bot-rig.gif
1074 ms
eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eproposal.sinarmasmsiglife.co.id
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Proposal Sinarmas MSIG Life. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: