1.8 sec in total
254 ms
1.4 sec
122 ms
Click here to check amazing EProtocol Stanford content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eprotocol.stanford.edu
Visit eprotocol.stanford.eduWe analyzed Eprotocol.stanford.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
eprotocol.stanford.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value2.9 s
79/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
254 ms
382 ms
87 ms
611 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Eprotocol.stanford.edu, 13% (2 requests) were made to Researchcompliance.stanford.edu and 13% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (611 ms) relates to the external source Researchcompliance.stanford.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 49.6 kB (51%)
98.3 kB
48.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Eprotocol.stanford.edu main page is 98.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 31.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EProtocol Stanford images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eprotocol.stanford.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (43%)
14
8
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EProtocol Stanford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
eprotocol.stanford.edu
254 ms
eprotocol.stanford.edu
382 ms
style-compiledbaf3c43282188d3c2fd882f141a7da7b.css
87 ms
homepage-announcements.html
611 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
66 ms
jquery.metadata.min.js
170 ms
jquery.tablesorter.min.js
255 ms
ieprotocol-compiledb12ddf7069224ef492d114c8b2a8f43e.js
254 ms
stanford-eprotocol-banner.gif
257 ms
body_bg.jpg
132 ms
committee_icon_dropshadow.png
132 ms
committee-sprite.jpg
202 ms
livechatjs.ashx
202 ms
livechat.ashx
191 ms
style.css
93 ms
eprotocol.stanford.edu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
eprotocol.stanford.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eprotocol.stanford.edu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eprotocol.stanford.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eprotocol.stanford.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eprotocol.stanford.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EProtocol Stanford. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: