2.9 sec in total
936 ms
1.6 sec
419 ms
Visit feedback.sipgate.de now to see the best up-to-date Feedback Sipgate content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about feedback.sipgate.de
Visit feedback.sipgate.deWe analyzed Feedback.sipgate.de page load time and found that the first response time was 936 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
feedback.sipgate.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value2,200 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
936 ms
335 ms
8 ms
57 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Feedback.sipgate.de, 34% (10 requests) were made to Assets0.uvcdn.com and 31% (9 requests) were made to Assets1.uvcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (936 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedback.sipgate.de.
Page size can be reduced by 462.0 kB (73%)
628.9 kB
166.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedback.sipgate.de main page is 628.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 289.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 207.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 207.7 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Feedback Sipgate needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 186.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedback.sipgate.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (74%)
27
7
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedback Sipgate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
feedback.sipgate.de
936 ms
107443-sipgate-team
335 ms
site2-87a7d09f563e8c7327c635d7803bfce5.css
8 ms
ga.js
57 ms
sipgate_20_logo_500_7324_0.jpg
133 ms
body_background-6e838f79846cc44b4268470bbb74a7cd.png
37 ms
d65a149ec2559db8d4ff8f202519db45
256 ms
signin_throbber-f8363010f580e2dde8c55280c84d9f11.gif
24 ms
signin_reset-652cd1801cde58a3994b3f98dea3a662.png
96 ms
black-70opacity-cee389dd0e8ab0ce18eff8f94351ee34.png
98 ms
facebook-0ae32c6b9db8433da3bff920000995f0.png
96 ms
google-fb06110d524fe305438f815805d6d649.png
96 ms
password-fb2771112fb14e2588f5beba6b59fb95.png
92 ms
10-24970ab6a4ac15c6228bc3e2b1335b1f.png
22 ms
password-fb2771112fb14e2588f5beba6b59fb95.png
93 ms
tab-selected-c2c3d3cf09884d1f72123b2f16ef0dd4.png
96 ms
facebook-0ae32c6b9db8433da3bff920000995f0.png
91 ms
google-fb06110d524fe305438f815805d6d649.png
97 ms
site2-57ae68b98156704d3452601ba218f2fe.js
82 ms
icon.search.16px-cfce09bbf3fecdea315d219558598330.png
229 ms
icon.idea.24px-a783bf1ed8cf8ae43ca2451384f637da.png
229 ms
icon.sidebar-search.24px-298cfb09447f78a0659231225c607dda.png
229 ms
icon.home.24px-606914b7f1fdca4344964019ef60cc04.png
230 ms
__utm.gif
174 ms
__utm.gif
162 ms
all.js
108 ms
sEvGchVJuwHVQqdD3Mvhg.js
107 ms
mixpanel.js
105 ms
close_reversed-355be84359c1c31ee8ed5b8bf066b1c1.png
10 ms
feedback.sipgate.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
feedback.sipgate.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
feedback.sipgate.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedback.sipgate.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedback.sipgate.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedback.sipgate.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Feedback Sipgate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: