9.5 sec in total
2.5 sec
6.7 sec
341 ms
Visit foodware.styleware.eu now to see the best up-to-date Foodware Styleware content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodware.styleware.eu
Рецепти за всякакви ястия и вкуснотии, които можете да си представите.
Visit foodware.styleware.euWe analyzed Foodware.styleware.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
foodware.styleware.eu performance score
2456 ms
318 ms
314 ms
312 ms
328 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Foodware.styleware.eu, 3% (2 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Foodware.styleware.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.7 MB
531.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Foodware.styleware.eu main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.6 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Foodware Styleware needs image optimization as it can save up to 128.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 821.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 821.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodware.styleware.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)
66
36
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodware Styleware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodware.styleware.eu
2456 ms
modal.css
318 ms
system.css
314 ms
general.css
312 ms
style.css
328 ms
style_common.css
360 ms
style1.css
463 ms
addons.css
490 ms
layout.css
477 ms
template.css
485 ms
usertools.css
489 ms
css3.css
527 ms
css.css
612 ms
k2.css
630 ms
typo.css
649 ms
template.css
637 ms
css.css
646 ms
template.css
859 ms
mootools-core.js
1254 ms
core.js
784 ms
mootools-more.js
1697 ms
jquery.min.js
1777 ms
modal.js
819 ms
jquery.min.js
27 ms
k2.noconflict.js
1034 ms
k2.js
1181 ms
core.js
1145 ms
css.js
1308 ms
joms.jquery.js
2429 ms
script-1.2.js
1963 ms
ajax_1.5.pack.js
1495 ms
system.css
1282 ms
k2.css
1373 ms
bodyBg.gif
202 ms
topBg.png
170 ms
twitter.png
198 ms
facebook.png
308 ms
rss.png
321 ms
mail.png
322 ms
headerBg.gif
334 ms
logo.png
343 ms
h3Bg.png
351 ms
f4b6dca0e2911082f0eb6e1df1a0e11d_M.jpg
916 ms
4965657af186b9092c7a96976ffe881c_M.jpg
959 ms
077ab55046ce80eaf9a3ddea999597ca_M.jpg
1127 ms
f4b6dca0e2911082f0eb6e1df1a0e11d_XS.jpg
496 ms
transparent_star.png
520 ms
readmoreA.png
675 ms
readmoreSpan.png
819 ms
4965657af186b9092c7a96976ffe881c_XS.jpg
963 ms
077ab55046ce80eaf9a3ddea999597ca_XS.jpg
1004 ms
c9b002fe1bb0320831a8ae78670fdb6f_XS.jpg
959 ms
fc1da7257992fc36032e11db3df7a664_XS.jpg
1278 ms
fd8b0f77d767f1f6640afba6916ff67c_XS.jpg
1252 ms
48ee1e8a0a8f50dce4f8cb9ab418e211_XS.jpg
1160 ms
3899dfe821816fbcb3db3e3b23f81585_XS.jpg
1157 ms
categoryTopH3.png
1252 ms
categoryBtm.png
1252 ms
menuArrowActive.gif
1308 ms
menuArrow.gif
1295 ms
bullet.gif
1415 ms
thumb_e5b317253849ffce6fa9fd6f.jpg
1425 ms
default.png
1420 ms
footerBg.png
2014 ms
badge.png
1453 ms
user.png
557 ms
user.png
1004 ms
foodware.styleware.eu SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodware.styleware.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Foodware.styleware.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodware.styleware.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foodware Styleware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: