4 sec in total
457 ms
3.4 sec
140 ms
Click here to check amazing Forum Skyscanner content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about forum.skyscanner.net
Travel wisdom on tap.
Visit forum.skyscanner.netWe analyzed Forum.skyscanner.net page load time and found that the first response time was 457 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
forum.skyscanner.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value3,410 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
457 ms
586 ms
64 ms
85 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Forum.skyscanner.net, 53% (41 requests) were made to Avatars.discourse.org and 41% (32 requests) were made to Cdn-standard.discourse.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cdn-standard.discourse.org.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (78%)
3.4 MB
730.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Forum.skyscanner.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 537 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Forum Skyscanner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forum.skyscanner.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (67%)
75
25
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forum Skyscanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
forum.skyscanner.net
457 ms
desktop_6a6e396188d67bf42583c4b5ce0d7e08b45f1129.css
586 ms
preload_store-d16a3675434b5a0043157cfc2b850471.js
64 ms
en-e0662bbf0f5d65078f30dfb73f32e444.js
85 ms
ember_jquery-37c15254b70c40ceb7888cb7248c79d6.js
79 ms
vendor-17831e059f10b3b31503434a43f32398.js
88 ms
application-060d1ba589f8479b6b208758ade02af4.js
107 ms
browser-update-1b088c371e098d02d2b87570660d5d68.js
25 ms
analytics.js
464 ms
f8f4ba0e741d11f99dae5a8498debf95dc56816a_1_690x165.png
688 ms
25.png
176 ms
25.png
55 ms
25.png
55 ms
25.png
81 ms
25.png
69 ms
25.png
58 ms
25.png
60 ms
25.png
61 ms
25.png
81 ms
25.png
64 ms
25.png
64 ms
25.png
79 ms
25.png
78 ms
25.png
78 ms
25.png
77 ms
25.png
82 ms
25.png
84 ms
25.png
86 ms
25.png
83 ms
25.png
81 ms
25.png
79 ms
25.png
95 ms
25.png
84 ms
25.png
84 ms
25.png
86 ms
25.png
86 ms
25.png
87 ms
25.png
91 ms
25.png
90 ms
25.png
94 ms
25.png
94 ms
25.png
91 ms
25.png
94 ms
25.png
94 ms
25.png
95 ms
25.png
96 ms
1_1.png
341 ms
22_1.png
358 ms
37_1.png
344 ms
28_1.png
369 ms
60_1.png
346 ms
128_1.png
669 ms
31_1.png
665 ms
195_1.png
688 ms
25_1.png
692 ms
32_1.png
681 ms
114_1.png
772 ms
213_1.png
984 ms
61_1.png
987 ms
26_1.png
1026 ms
150_1.png
1015 ms
148_1.png
1002 ms
27_1.png
1078 ms
49_1.png
1313 ms
100_1.png
1294 ms
108_1.png
1316 ms
170_1.png
1335 ms
13_1.png
1352 ms
grippie-d28a6f65e22c0033dcf0d63883bcc590.png
1079 ms
fontawesome-webfont-90e687312466f7a4993c85399c116f2f.woff
1501 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
76 ms
25.png
49 ms
25.png
48 ms
25.png
50 ms
25.png
42 ms
25.png
44 ms
ga-audiences
62 ms
forum.skyscanner.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
forum.skyscanner.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
forum.skyscanner.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forum.skyscanner.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Forum.skyscanner.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
forum.skyscanner.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Forum Skyscanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: