3.6 sec in total
259 ms
3.3 sec
91 ms
Welcome to mailman.stanford.edu homepage info - get ready to check Mailman Stanford best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mailman.stanford.edu
Create, manage, view, or copy lists Request a new list Only Stanford community members with a full-service SUNet ID may request a new list. Manage the lists you own Only Stanford community members wit...
Visit mailman.stanford.eduWe analyzed Mailman.stanford.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
mailman.stanford.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
259 ms
604 ms
330 ms
379 ms
251 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mailman.stanford.edu, 68% (26 requests) were made to Uit.stanford.edu and 11% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Uit.stanford.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 442.4 kB (75%)
588.1 kB
145.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Mailman.stanford.edu main page is 588.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 359.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. This web page is already compressed.
Potential reduce by 145.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailman.stanford.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 296.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (91%)
33
3
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailman Stanford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mailman.stanford.edu
259 ms
tools
604 ms
tools
330 ms
tools
379 ms
css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css
251 ms
css_8WsBE51ZLaFfp0zwBAlE3X3LwLPjbG0g87gpHZu-DlA.css
297 ms
css_b_V5rf2qKXfXoVMOGEx89EWxe3ycPAaCUJ73t5anm1o.css
388 ms
css_ZkUqnHCHG4qW55MrylMtK30A9SRgVPWYXgIOQgJDQ4M.css
502 ms
stanford_itservices_custom.css
463 ms
css_wHxt7EdVrNFym4sV7rLm_Tw1_dzZkWtJD6MxORJmc5k.css
560 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
718 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
666 ms
jquery.once.js
741 ms
drupal.js
833 ms
google_cse.js
882 ms
googleanalytics.js
916 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1001 ms
open_framework.js
1049 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
1084 ms
stanford-framework.js
1214 ms
stanford_itservices.js
1254 ms
footable.js
1298 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1308 ms
js_injector_10.js
1336 ms
js_injector_11.js
1419 ms
js_injector_12.js
1457 ms
js_injector_15.js
1510 ms
css
61 ms
css
70 ms
cse.js
58 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
jsapi
54 ms
collect
11 ms
default+en.css
11 ms
default.css
47 ms
default+en.I.js
19 ms
default.css
15 ms
css_nTr55mbZYlMSsBXnLjRgu7jXCLkPIwg_iGLiIvrYokQ.css
176 ms
mailman.stanford.edu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
mailman.stanford.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mailman.stanford.edu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailman.stanford.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mailman.stanford.edu main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
mailman.stanford.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mailman Stanford. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: