1.5 sec in total
182 ms
1.2 sec
199 ms
Visit nanoc.stoneship.org now to see the best up-to-date Nanoc Stoneship content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanoc.stoneship.org
Visit nanoc.stoneship.orgWe analyzed Nanoc.stoneship.org page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
nanoc.stoneship.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
182 ms
258 ms
168 ms
24 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nanoc.stoneship.org, 59% (16 requests) were made to Nanoc.ws and 19% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (365 ms) relates to the external source Nanoc.ws.
Page size can be reduced by 515.6 kB (19%)
2.7 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Nanoc.stoneship.org main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 495.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nanoc Stoneship needs image optimization as it can save up to 495.4 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanoc.stoneship.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
20
20
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nanoc Stoneship. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
nanoc.stoneship.org
182 ms
nanoc.ws
258 ms
screen-v44.css
168 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
github-api.png
220 ms
rubyworld-conference.png
250 ms
myst-online.png
272 ms
ugly-betty.png
266 ms
spree-api.png
219 ms
fosdem.png
365 ms
ga.js
33 ms
logo-nav-active.png
169 ms
symphony.png
170 ms
chooser-download.png
188 ms
chooser-tour.png
219 ms
chooser-learn.png
218 ms
background-dark.png
317 ms
logo-footer.png
330 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
11 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
12 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM0DauxaEVho0aInXGvhmB4k.ttf
11 ms
N4duVc9C58uwPiY8_59Fz5_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
33 ms
hMqPNLsu_dywMa4C_DEpY50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
14 ms
inpage_linkid.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
print-v5.css
162 ms
nanoc.stoneship.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
nanoc.stoneship.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
nanoc.stoneship.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanoc.stoneship.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanoc.stoneship.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nanoc.stoneship.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nanoc Stoneship. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: