4.1 sec in total
662 ms
2.9 sec
542 ms
Click here to check amazing Old Shoppingonlinestores content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about old.shoppingonlinestores.com
Explore Kamyar Shah's website- Your gateway to insights, expertise, and innovation in business and leadership.
Visit old.shoppingonlinestores.comWe analyzed Old.shoppingonlinestores.com page load time and found that the first response time was 662 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
old.shoppingonlinestores.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.187
65/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
662 ms
36 ms
45 ms
82 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Old.shoppingonlinestores.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 627.1 kB (64%)
974.7 kB
347.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Old.shoppingonlinestores.com main page is 974.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 657.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Old Shoppingonlinestores images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 419.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Old.shoppingonlinestores.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (72%)
61
17
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Old Shoppingonlinestores. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
old.shoppingonlinestores.com
662 ms
css
36 ms
css
45 ms
style.css
82 ms
shortcodes.css
156 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
144 ms
genericons.css
200 ms
jetpack.css
136 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
159 ms
page_templates.css
151 ms
jquery.js
265 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
205 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
7 ms
gprofiles.js
64 ms
wpgroho.js
221 ms
superfish.js
207 ms
custom.js
216 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
258 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
326 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
327 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
header-9601.jpg
315 ms
breadcrumbs_bullet.png
87 ms
facebook.png
87 ms
twitter.png
86 ms
ca-pub-0666695736298344.js
268 ms
zrt_lookup.html
257 ms
show_ads_impl.js
154 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
115 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
135 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
136 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
137 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
247 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
150 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf
248 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
149 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
246 ms
g.gif
196 ms
hovercard.css
194 ms
services.css
208 ms
ads
333 ms
osd.js
17 ms
likebox.php
206 ms
ads
301 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
413 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
450 ms
1kPfZUdGrka.js
581 ms
Yuj_Y8xNH2C.js
711 ms
Mpe38fuBVZ2.js
579 ms
n8qIhCw3vMx.js
579 ms
css
76 ms
m_js_controller.js
43 ms
abg.js
49 ms
favicon
106 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
61 ms
s
68 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
90 ms
x_button_blue2.png
43 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
12 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
107 ms
165195_181784941845199_2061268_n.jpg
357 ms
11149435_762817117164416_2721432659356769172_n.jpg
461 ms
12651329_1526352087694196_6282122850598795537_n.jpg
530 ms
7167_1394469247445749_1662962520_n.jpg
554 ms
12011394_884033655018906_3981245603821153230_n.jpg
597 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
73 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
72 ms
activeview
20 ms
activeview
20 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
71 ms
AmlxWlqMvlv.js
72 ms
ui
44 ms
old.shoppingonlinestores.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
old.shoppingonlinestores.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
old.shoppingonlinestores.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Old.shoppingonlinestores.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Old.shoppingonlinestores.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
old.shoppingonlinestores.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Old Shoppingonlinestores. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: