Tools & Wizards About Us
resumewriting.servicesreview.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

resumewriting.servicesreview.net

servicesreview.net

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

866 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

221 ms

resumewriting.servicesreview.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Resumewriting Servicesreview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resumewriting.servicesreview.net

You need a new job, and your new employer needs to see your professional resume first! Do not be making another blind guess, choose the resume service with the

Visit resumewriting.servicesreview.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Resumewriting.servicesreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 866 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resumewriting.servicesreview.net performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resumewriting.servicesreview.net

866 ms

style.css

140 ms

css

23 ms

jquery.min.js

214 ms

custom.js

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Resumewriting.servicesreview.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (866 ms) belongs to the original domain Resumewriting.servicesreview.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 679.4 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

495.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Resumewriting.servicesreview.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 848.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 70.4 kB

  • Original 94.2 kB
  • After minification 91.7 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 193.3 kB
  • After minification 165.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Resumewriting Servicesreview needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 550.4 kB

  • Original 848.8 kB
  • After minification 826.9 kB
  • After compression 298.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 550.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resumewriting.servicesreview.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (60%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resumewriting Servicesreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resumewriting.servicesreview.net

resumewriting.servicesreview.net

866 ms

style.css

style.css

140 ms

css

css

23 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

214 ms

custom.js

custom.js

150 ms

jqueryslidemenu.js

jqueryslidemenu.js

153 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

151 ms

jwplayer.js

jwplayer.js

340 ms

jquery.rating.css

jquery.rating.css

225 ms

global.css

global.css

236 ms

styles.css

styles.css

218 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

323 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

285 ms

magical-javascript-thing.js

magical-javascript-thing.js

294 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

294 ms

jquery.MetaData.js

jquery.MetaData.js

305 ms

jquery.rating.pack.js

jquery.rating.pack.js

352 ms

jtip.js

jtip.js

370 ms

jscolor.js

jscolor.js

378 ms

tw-sack.min.js

tw-sack.min.js

334 ms

js

js

19 ms

defaults.css

defaults.css

342 ms

table-styles.css

table-styles.css

357 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

7 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

11 ms

style.css

style.css

292 ms

jquery.color.min.js

jquery.color.min.js

287 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

297 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

322 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

323 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

80 ms

ga.js

ga.js

93 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

182 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

322 ms

feed.png

feed.png

141 ms

logo.png

logo.png

294 ms

1.png

1.png

293 ms

2.png

2.png

294 ms

3.png

3.png

293 ms

4.png

4.png

318 ms

5.png

5.png

319 ms

ProfessionalCVServices.net-Review-125x125.png

ProfessionalCVServices.net-Review-125x125.png

363 ms

Review-of-Resume-Writing-Service-amazingresumesmd.com--125x125.png

Review-of-Resume-Writing-Service-amazingresumesmd.com--125x125.png

377 ms

logo.png

logo.png

319 ms

ca-pub-7820300266812490.js

ca-pub-7820300266812490.js

308 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

306 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

209 ms

bg-nav.gif

bg-nav.gif

355 ms

bg-search.png

bg-search.png

353 ms

search-btn.png

search-btn.png

354 ms

bg-shadow-top.png

bg-shadow-top.png

352 ms

default-star.png

default-star.png

370 ms

visit-site.png

visit-site.png

395 ms

bg-sb.png

bg-sb.png

404 ms

bg-sb-top.png

bg-sb-top.png

404 ms

bg-sb-bot.png

bg-sb-bot.png

298 ms

0IZPA9DbzKXnGZABsAivT50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

0IZPA9DbzKXnGZABsAivT50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

185 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

170 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

124 ms

ads

ads

298 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

53 ms

osd.js

osd.js

50 ms

pixel

pixel

15 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

7769555995788931959

7769555995788931959

44 ms

abg.js

abg.js

54 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

64 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

43 ms

s

s

34 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

33 ms

Accessibility Review

resumewriting.servicesreview.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

resumewriting.servicesreview.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

resumewriting.servicesreview.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resumewriting.servicesreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Resumewriting.servicesreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resumewriting.servicesreview.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Resumewriting Servicesreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: