7.1 sec in total
760 ms
5.2 sec
1.1 sec
Visit sa-smf.com now to see the best up-to-date Sa Smf content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sa-smf.com
Visit sa-smf.comWe analyzed Sa-smf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 760 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sa-smf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
760 ms
170 ms
66 ms
253 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Sa-smf.com, 25% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Sa-smf.com.
Page size can be reduced by 222.0 kB (55%)
405.5 kB
183.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Sa-smf.com main page is 405.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 175.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sa Smf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sa-smf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)
16
10
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sa Smf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sa-smf.com
760 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
170 ms
css
66 ms
genericons.css
253 ms
style.css
183 ms
jquery.js
350 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
252 ms
masonry.min.js
279 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
287 ms
functions.js
386 ms
wp-embed.min.js
386 ms
circle.png
637 ms
search-icon.png
637 ms
images-36.jpg
636 ms
images-16.jpg
712 ms
images-56.jpg
765 ms
images-57.jpg
782 ms
0215.jpeg
2951 ms
097.jpeg
2962 ms
021.jpeg
3081 ms
0175.jpeg
3053 ms
0133.jpeg
3083 ms
0093.jpeg
3341 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
587 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
605 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
604 ms
JGVZEP92dXgoQBG1CnQcfKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
618 ms
x-sAbYHwdJCKPJ06aP6Wqw.ttf
619 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6I48KljrVa8Zcyi9xGGohEU.ttf
619 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf
618 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6KQ4IK8jcFikBX2R8jKe4LU.ttf
619 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
1 ms
sa-smf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
sa-smf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
sa-smf.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sa-smf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Sa-smf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sa-smf.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sa Smf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: