9.3 sec in total
167 ms
8.9 sec
155 ms
Visit sabil.us now to see the best up-to-date Sabil content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sabil.us
Visit sabil.usWe analyzed Sabil.us page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sabil.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value23.6 s
0/100
10%
Value4,790 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.181
67/100
15%
Value40.1 s
0/100
10%
167 ms
143 ms
4224 ms
250 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sabil.us, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) relates to the external source Sabilalihssan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 120.0 kB (9%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Sabil.us main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sabil images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 414 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (83%)
87
15
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sabil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sabilalihssan.com
167 ms
sabilalihssan.com
143 ms
sabilalihssan.com
4224 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
250 ms
otw-grid.css
290 ms
general_foundicons.css
266 ms
social_foundicons.css
266 ms
otw_shortcode.css
268 ms
jc-style.css
232 ms
frontend_style.css
476 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
481 ms
thickbox.css
483 ms
dashicons.min.css
578 ms
thickbox.css
475 ms
style.css
492 ms
btn.css
692 ms
superfish.css
722 ms
font-awesome.min.css
699 ms
twitterfeed.css
717 ms
flickrfeed.css
708 ms
comments.css
783 ms
widget-forms.css
896 ms
sidebar.css
899 ms
footer.css
925 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
955 ms
responsive.css
989 ms
custom.php
1986 ms
flexslider.css
1100 ms
flexisel.css
1093 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1164 ms
form-basic.min.css
1250 ms
ytprefs.min.css
1323 ms
dynamic.css
1361 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.css
105 ms
bigContact.css
1539 ms
jquery.js
1643 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1607 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
1780 ms
zedity-reset.css
1798 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.css
1730 ms
calendar-jos.css
1730 ms
color-picker.min.css
1766 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
1753 ms
frontend_script.js
1788 ms
gmedia.global.front.js
1932 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
2010 ms
ytprefs.min.js
1793 ms
calendar.js
1813 ms
calendar-setup.js
1824 ms
calendar_function.js
1847 ms
bootstrap.css
2028 ms
main.css
1991 ms
jc-script.js
1930 ms
thickbox.js
1857 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1914 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
1840 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
2015 ms
jquery.tweet.js
1977 ms
superfish.js
1889 ms
hoverIntent.js
1893 ms
hovertile.js
1870 ms
tinynav.js
1873 ms
retina.js
1923 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.js
1880 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1919 ms
jquery.flexisel.js
1831 ms
ajax-email.js
1752 ms
jquery.hoverPanel.js
1686 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
1785 ms
main.js
1641 ms
init.js
1589 ms
fitvids.min.js
1562 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1426 ms
forms-api.min.js
1433 ms
zedity-responsive.min.js
1534 ms
iframe_api
51 ms
main-header.png
908 ms
Sabil-Logo-1024x199White.png
120 ms
SabilSliderOne.jpg
131 ms
SabilSliderTwo.jpg
144 ms
SabilSliderThree.jpg
141 ms
Zakat_Button_Large_135x82.png
147 ms
Donate_Button_Large_136x81.png
166 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
905 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
893 ms
banner-background-image._CB309675353_.png
76 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
www-widgetapi.js
54 ms
collect
14 ms
Sabil-Logo-1024x199White.png
806 ms
SabilSliderOne.jpg
1139 ms
SabilSliderThree.jpg
1472 ms
SabilSliderTwo.jpg
1510 ms
Zakat_Button_Large_135x82.png
955 ms
Donate_Button_Large_136x81.png
931 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
256 ms
bg_direction_nav_black.png
396 ms
arrows-ffffff.png
452 ms
ul-arrow.png
474 ms
sabil.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sabil.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sabil.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sabil.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sabil.us main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
sabil.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sabil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: