13.4 sec in total
3.6 sec
9.4 sec
477 ms
Visit sac.ru now to see the best up-to-date Sac content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sac.ru
Ремонт и обслуживании машин в Спецавтоцентре ГлавУпДК для дипломатических представительств и международных организаций, аккредитованных в Москве. Технический осмотр, диагностика и устранение неисправн...
Visit sac.ruWe analyzed Sac.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
sac.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value2,190 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
3557 ms
135 ms
216 ms
399 ms
400 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Sac.ru, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sac.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 93.9 kB (9%)
1.0 MB
930.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Sac.ru main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 917.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.3 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (48%)
82
43
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sac.ru
3557 ms
css
135 ms
default.css
216 ms
grid.css
399 ms
common.css
400 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
401 ms
jquery.formstyler.css
1079 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
424 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
426 ms
mejs-skins.css
559 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
560 ms
jquery-ui.structure.min.css
564 ms
jquery-ui.theme.min.css
589 ms
style.css
592 ms
fine-tuning.css
750 ms
common-fix.css
754 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
1019 ms
modernizr.js
766 ms
translate.js.php
1251 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1337 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
902 ms
jquery.jcarousel.js
902 ms
jq.cookies.js
1168 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1068 ms
jquery.smslider.min.js
1265 ms
jquery.searchTargets.js
1271 ms
jquery.plugin.min.js
1271 ms
jquery.datepick.min.js
1601 ms
jquery.datepick-ru.js
1272 ms
jquery.formstyler.min.js
1371 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
1405 ms
store.min.js
1404 ms
favorite.js
1406 ms
formListener.js
1436 ms
common.js
1450 ms
sac.js
1509 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
logo_updk.svg
254 ms
link-drop-arrow.png
276 ms
talk_chat.png
318 ms
lk-icon.png
330 ms
logo.svg
444 ms
phone.svg
449 ms
bn-slider1.jpg
958 ms
bn-slider2.jpg
2034 ms
bn-sm1.jpg
1864 ms
spec_services.png
504 ms
bn-sm2.png
1049 ms
bn-sm3.png
1077 ms
bn-sm4.png
1528 ms
bn-sm5.jpg
1179 ms
bn-mid1.jpg
1987 ms
btn-spr.png
1234 ms
bn-mid2.jpg
1783 ms
svg-1-1.svg
1382 ms
svg1-1-1.svg
1538 ms
svg1-1-2.svg
1660 ms
svg1-1-3.svg
1670 ms
svg1-2-1.svg
1798 ms
svg1-2-2.svg
1811 ms
svg-1-2.svg
1983 ms
svg2-1-1.svg
1988 ms
svg2-1-2.svg
1996 ms
svg2-1-3.svg
1929 ms
svg-1-3.svg
2076 ms
collect
23 ms
dincondensedc.svg
2072 ms
pt-sans-narrow-bold.woff
3341 ms
pt_sans_narrow.woff
4244 ms
svg-2-1.svg
2102 ms
svg4-1-1.svg
2078 ms
svg4-1-2.svg
2194 ms
svg4-1-3.svg
2154 ms
svg-2-2.svg
2165 ms
svg-2-3.svg
2157 ms
svg6-1-1.svg
2211 ms
svg6-1-2.svg
2232 ms
watch.js
57 ms
svg6-1-3.svg
2106 ms
svg6-2-1.svg
2109 ms
svg6-2-2.svg
2232 ms
social.svg
2193 ms
f-search-icon.png
1744 ms
promo-slider-arr.png
1660 ms
transparent.png
1773 ms
dincondensedc.woff
783 ms
print.css
144 ms
sac.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
sac.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sac.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sac.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sac.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sac.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: