Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

sal.im

Account Suspended

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

379 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

189 ms

sal.im screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sal.im

Salim Saeed is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Salim Saeed and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the...

Visit sal.im

Key Findings

We analyzed Sal.im page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sal.im performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sal.im

379 ms

salim.saeed

427 ms

aDk70ZHFIl3.css

75 ms

wmiz7xzFfqO.css

44 ms

IWXAbM4pe57.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sal.im, 66% (50 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 24% (18 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.2 kB (40%)

Content Size

215.6 kB

After Optimization

130.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Sal.im main page is 215.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 109.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 106.1 kB
  • After minification 106.1 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 109.6 kB
  • After minification 104.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sal images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (58%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sal.im accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sal.im best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sal.im SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sal.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sal.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: