2 sec in total
49 ms
1.4 sec
518 ms
Click here to check amazing Sandsof content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sandsof.com
Art, Design, Media, Food, Products, People, Culture + More
Visit sandsof.comWe analyzed Sandsof.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sandsof.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
49 ms
127 ms
122 ms
135 ms
122 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sandsof.com, 66% (49 requests) were made to Sandsofdotcom1.files.wordpress.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (941 ms) relates to the external source Sandsofdotcom1.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 266.7 kB (11%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Sandsof.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sandsof images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 188.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandsof.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 53% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (19%)
68
55
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sandsof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sandsof.com
49 ms
127 ms
122 ms
style.css
135 ms
gprofiles.js
122 ms
wpgroho.js
111 ms
111 ms
121 ms
w.js
91 ms
merriweather.css
10 ms
globals.css
11 ms
forms.css
12 ms
reveal.css
12 ms
ui.css
13 ms
cropped-screen-shot-2013-03-11-at-8-11-50-pm.png
136 ms
hovercard.css
70 ms
services.css
126 ms
15107433622_afbda0254b_b2.jpg
194 ms
seen3.jpg
227 ms
queen_4heads_fm_hands_5001.jpg
156 ms
bike31.jpg
256 ms
thomas_edison.jpg
216 ms
ping-pong-coffee-table-11.jpg
250 ms
befunky_koolandthegang5.jpg
240 ms
vintage_photo_swimmers_cropped1.jpg
280 ms
cropped-screen-shot-2013-08-27-at-6-35-23-pm1.png
210 ms
untitled_74cropped.jpg
320 ms
martha__the_vandellas_cropped.jpg
296 ms
img_20140628_083725.jpg
312 ms
img_20140607_081834.jpg
345 ms
screen-shot-2013-01-11-at-12-40-57-am.png
347 ms
img_11056884914856722.jpg
376 ms
img_740236117968533.jpeg
398 ms
cropped-screen-shot-2013-08-25-at-7-08-16-pm.png
447 ms
screen-shot-2014-01-02-at-6-16-52-pm.png
536 ms
woman_on_top_1996_by_john_wesley.jpg
434 ms
scott_campbell_always_almost_there.jpg
350 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-26-at-11-52-27-am.png
450 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-25-at-4-52-17-pm.png
630 ms
jackson_5.jpg
472 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-19-at-4-48-28-pm.png
600 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-16-at-5-01-29-pm.png
585 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-15-at-7-25-48-pm.png
453 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-15-at-7-15-24-pm.png
456 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-14-at-10-02-16-pm.png
941 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-13-at-9-46-51-pm.png
738 ms
poo_printer.jpg
618 ms
mo_mug1.jpg
686 ms
cropped-cropped-cropped-screen-shot-2013-12-10-at-2-19-39-pm1.png
691 ms
roger_weiss6.jpg
686 ms
sd_card.png
824 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-29-at-11-59-33-pm2.png
793 ms
input-bg.png
82 ms
Noticons.svg
82 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
32 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
74 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
107 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
123 ms
g.gif
113 ms
cropped-screen-shot-2013-03-11-at-8-11-50-pm.png
658 ms
g.gif
93 ms
g.gif
93 ms
ninja_stars_magnets1.jpg
659 ms
screen-shot-2013-11-28-at-11-15-22-am.png
526 ms
table_it_competition.jpg
506 ms
screen-shot-2013-12-29-at-11-54-32-pm.png
596 ms
hypefortype.jpg
539 ms
screen-shot-2013-11-22-at-1-01-38-pm.png
707 ms
screen-shot-2013-11-22-at-12-04-14-am.png
796 ms
sounds_of_thread_bertrand_lanthiez.jpg
663 ms
screen-shot-2013-11-19-at-11-41-27-pm.png
537 ms
screen-shot-2013-11-19-at-5-08-18-am.png
522 ms
lightcap_300_lantern_water_bottle.jpg
613 ms
i_love_type.jpg
635 ms
sandsof.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sandsof.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Uses deprecated APIs
Browser errors were logged to the console
sandsof.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandsof.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Sandsof.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sandsof.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sandsof. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: