4.1 sec in total
994 ms
2.8 sec
352 ms
Visit santamara.ru now to see the best up-to-date Santamara content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about santamara.ru
Visit santamara.ruWe analyzed Santamara.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 994 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
santamara.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
994 ms
135 ms
253 ms
252 ms
255 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Santamara.ru, 6% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to C.betrad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (994 ms) belongs to the original domain Santamara.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 348.8 kB (31%)
1.1 MB
793.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Santamara.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 606.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Santamara images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 261.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.4 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Santamara.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (53%)
97
46
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Santamara. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
santamara.ru
994 ms
style.css
135 ms
nextgen_gallery_related_images.css
253 ms
styles.css
252 ms
fancybox.css
255 ms
pagenavi-css.css
254 ms
ajax.js
256 ms
jquery.js
391 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
386 ms
persist.js
393 ms
store.js
388 ms
ngg_store.js
393 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
387 ms
lightbox_context.js
510 ms
trigger_buttons.css
511 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
512 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.css
514 ms
style.css
517 ms
nggallery.css
518 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
reset.css
504 ms
tipografy.css
506 ms
bgr-header.jpg
514 ms
thumbs_m01.JPG
134 ms
thumbs_m02.jpg
136 ms
thumbs_m03.jpg
137 ms
thumbs_m04.JPG
136 ms
thumbs_m05.jpg
135 ms
21-300x300.jpg
258 ms
jkt1-300x2301.jpg
261 ms
clinic1.jpg
259 ms
slide_1_01-300x159.jpg
259 ms
cancer-penian1-300x200.jpg
261 ms
1089ad0a23c95d75eb44fab3c3a72c151-300x194.jpg
380 ms
gorod1-150x150.jpg
383 ms
kau1-300x225.jpg
512 ms
1451-300x196.jpg
388 ms
otduh_v_anape_s_detjmi11-300x213.jpg
390 ms
img-footer.jpg
513 ms
ca-pub-7195062354417955.js
57 ms
zrt_lookup.html
60 ms
show_ads_impl.js
61 ms
aci.js
225 ms
j.png
486 ms
m.png
490 ms
hit
274 ms
ads
329 ms
osd.js
12 ms
ads
317 ms
ads
302 ms
97 ms
196 ms
hit
135 ms
280 ms
133 ms
adj
147 ms
bsredirect5.js
203 ms
ca
75 ms
beacon
135 ms
15707880602772982090
77 ms
abg.js
81 ms
m_js_controller.js
92 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
70 ms
343 ms
s
43 ms
x_button_blue2.png
43 ms
70 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=qk1cfvwl;ord=1650155450
220 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=ijhardnr;ord=1650155450
259 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=4ztf2oue;ord=1650155450
217 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=aoyjbkr6;ord=1650155450
222 ms
0
234 ms
surly.js
138 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
32 ms
index.html
312 ms
verify_selector.js
252 ms
blank.gif
257 ms
bst2tv3.html
232 ms
verifyc.js
136 ms
ba.html
71 ms
pixel
75 ms
4.gif
78 ms
lidar.js
59 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
58 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
16 ms
match
244 ms
pixel
59 ms
pixel
60 ms
4311.js
28 ms
psa
77 ms
setuid
58 ms
verifyr.js
36 ms
sd
19 ms
29851e6be3b2ab7e377165d64187ed09.jpg
47 ms
beacon.js
31 ms
0
17 ms
bg.png
32 ms
adchoices.en.png
74 ms
FaceBody_160x600_logo.gif
32 ms
FaceBody_160x600_bg.jpg
70 ms
box_19_top-right.png
10 ms
ci.png
6 ms
ui
37 ms
santamara.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
santamara.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
santamara.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Santamara.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Santamara.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
santamara.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Santamara. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: