5.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.7 sec
299 ms
Welcome to sarll.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Sarll best content right away, or after learning these important things about sarll.co.uk
Visit sarll.co.ukWe analyzed Sarll.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sarll.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.467
19/100
15%
Value26.5 s
0/100
10%
1916 ms
222 ms
200 ms
330 ms
521 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Sarll.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Sarll.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (50%)
2.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sarll.co.uk main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 283.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sarll needs image optimization as it can save up to 283.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 714.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 714.4 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 370.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sarll.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 370.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (46%)
71
38
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sarll. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sarll.co.uk
1916 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
222 ms
styles.css
200 ms
font-awesome.min.css
330 ms
bootstrap.css
521 ms
front.css
566 ms
fl-icons.css
334 ms
flatsome.css
602 ms
flatsome-shop.css
340 ms
style.css
424 ms
jquery.js
618 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
434 ms
bootstrap.min.js
519 ms
front.js
530 ms
api.js
36 ms
scripts.js
434 ms
jquery.form.min.js
433 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
489 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
508 ms
js.cookie.min.js
508 ms
woocommerce.min.js
509 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
509 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
508 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
511 ms
flatsome.js
796 ms
woocommerce.js
698 ms
wp-embed.min.js
695 ms
zxcvbn-async.min.js
622 ms
password-strength-meter.min.js
624 ms
password-strength-meter.min.js
623 ms
api.js
22 ms
css
30 ms
webfont.js
117 ms
recaptcha__en.js
121 ms
SMP_grey_logo.png
274 ms
cabinet_solid_2-400x400.jpg
308 ms
cabinet_solid-400x400.jpg
307 ms
SRWMCAB-400x400.jpg
310 ms
RSP-400x400.jpg
308 ms
hdpf-1-400x400.jpg
370 ms
hdpf-2-400x400.jpg
512 ms
SINGLE-SIDED-OUTDOOR-COLUMN-400x400.jpg
511 ms
LG-HAUSYS-LVT-BROWSER-400x400.jpg
515 ms
4-SIDED-OUTSIDE-COLUMN-400x400.jpg
515 ms
2-X-1-CAGE-DISPLAY-2-400x400.jpg
516 ms
2-X-1-CAGE-DISPLAY-1-400x400.jpg
515 ms
yale-spinner-2-400x400.jpg
516 ms
cubus-1-400x400.jpg
516 ms
PRODUCT-DISPLAY-TABLE-400x400.jpg
517 ms
vodafone-400x400.png
516 ms
Underground-400x400.png
545 ms
tesco_logo_transparent-400x400.png
563 ms
TateModern-400x400.png
645 ms
superdrug-logo-400x400.png
563 ms
savoy-hotel-400x400.png
568 ms
sainsburys-400x400.png
611 ms
RBS-Logo-400x400.png
577 ms
O2-400x400.png
580 ms
fl-icons.ttf
588 ms
Heathrow_Logo_2013-400x400.png
580 ms
CarpetRight-400x400.png
642 ms
Next-Logo-400x400.png
647 ms
MinistryOfDefence.svg-400x400.png
650 ms
BT_Logo-400x400.png
654 ms
css
86 ms
Boots-400x400.png
560 ms
Mcdonalds-logo-400x400.png
567 ms
Body_Shop_logo-400x400.png
562 ms
makitalogo-400x400.png
551 ms
London_Olympics_logo-400x400.png
554 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
30 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
30 ms
Hoover.png
556 ms
homebase-400x400.png
544 ms
zxcvbn.min.js
370 ms
sarll.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sarll.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sarll.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sarll.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sarll.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sarll.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sarll. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: