Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

saxoboard.net

Ihr Profi für Bad + Dusche | Saxoboard Shop

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

304 ms

saxoboard.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to saxoboard.net homepage info - get ready to check Saxoboard best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about saxoboard.net

Duschen und Duschelemente befliesbar und individuell konfigurierbar. Top Preis-Leistung vom Spezialisten: Kurze Lieferzeit + versandkostenfrei ab 50 EUR.

Visit saxoboard.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Saxoboard.net page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

saxoboard.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.292

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

saxoboard.net

346 ms

www.saxoboard.net

334 ms

www.saxoboard.net

829 ms

head-03b8c3059bf5edf2083b519e0aaf6eaf.merged.gz.css

307 ms

head-2f1cf0c8cad4d6b63fcf2cd6fe3c1e19.merged.gz.js

618 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Saxoboard.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (895 ms) belongs to the original domain Saxoboard.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (57%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

837.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Saxoboard.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 714.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 69.1 kB

  • Original 84.2 kB
  • After minification 78.1 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 91.7 kB

  • Original 625.7 kB
  • After minification 534.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Saxoboard needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 498.0 kB

  • Original 714.2 kB
  • After minification 687.2 kB
  • After compression 216.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 498.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 431.9 kB

  • Original 504.0 kB
  • After minification 496.6 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saxoboard.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 431.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (45%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saxoboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

saxoboard.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

saxoboard.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

saxoboard.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saxoboard.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saxoboard.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Saxoboard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: