3.3 sec in total
21 ms
2.5 sec
731 ms
Welcome to scheipeter.com homepage info - get ready to check Scheipeter best content right away, or after learning these important things about scheipeter.com
Remodeling Services in St. Louis, MO. Need Design Build Remodeling help in St. Louis? Get a FREE Remodeling Consultation by S.W. Scheipeter Construction
Visit scheipeter.comWe analyzed Scheipeter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
scheipeter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
76/100
10%
Value9.4 s
1/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.172
70/100
15%
Value10.3 s
25/100
10%
21 ms
2079 ms
14 ms
23 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Scheipeter.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Scheipeter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.3 kB (8%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Scheipeter.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scheipeter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 29.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scheipeter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (57%)
54
23
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scheipeter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scheipeter.com
21 ms
scheipeter.com
2079 ms
style.min.css
14 ms
eae.min.css
23 ms
v4-shims.min.css
32 ms
all.min.css
48 ms
vegas.min.css
30 ms
public.min.css
33 ms
style.min.css
39 ms
theme.bundle.min.css
34 ms
frontend.min.css
51 ms
general.min.css
49 ms
jquery.min.js
62 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
50 ms
public.min.js
62 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
76 ms
companion.bundle.min.js
78 ms
eae.min.js
75 ms
v4-shims.min.js
76 ms
animated-main.min.js
76 ms
particles.min.js
77 ms
magnific.min.js
78 ms
vegas.min.js
78 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
77 ms
masonry.min.js
78 ms
theme.bundle.min.js
79 ms
general.min.js
78 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
79 ms
mailcheck.min.js
80 ms
punycode.min.js
80 ms
utils.min.js
79 ms
wpforms.min.js
80 ms
api.js
46 ms
companion.bundle.min.css
13 ms
css
29 ms
cropped-S.W.SCHEIPETER.png
12 ms
logo2.png
14 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Kitchen-Remodeling-St-Louis-Lawson-After.jpg
168 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Home-Remodeling-St-Louis.jpg
57 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Home-Remodeling-St-Louis-Garland-dining-room-after.jpg
22 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Home-Remodeling-St-Louis-impicchiche-after.jpg
23 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Home-Remodeling-St-Louis-Garland-dining-room-after-1.jpg
23 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Remodeling-St-Louis-Garland-hearth-room-after.jpg
54 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Bathroom-Remodeling-St-Louis-Joyce-After.jpg
53 ms
Scheipeter-Home-Additions-St-Louis-Joyce-After.jpg
55 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Kitchen-Remodeling-St-Louis-Joyce-After.jpg
54 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Home-Remodeling-St-Louis-1.jpg
56 ms
cropped-scheipeter-kitchen-remodeling-st-louis-rose-red-motiff.jpg
85 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Home-Additions-St-Louis-entertainment-room-scott-kayte.jpg
83 ms
cropped-scheipeter-kitchen-remodeling-st-louis-picture.jpg
84 ms
cropped-Scheipeter-Kitchen-Remodeling-St-Louis-testimonial-rick-becky.jpg
84 ms
Copy-of-Copy-of-Untitled-8.jpg
106 ms
Tile-That-Looks-Like-Wood-vs-Hardwood-Flooring-1-1024x481.jpg
86 ms
The-Big-Debate-Metal-Studs-Vs-Wood-Studs5_Scheipeter-construction-600x421.jpg
107 ms
Scheipeter-Kitchen-Remodeling-St-Louis-counter-top.jpg
107 ms
210936_330298503657902_379517632_o-1.jpg
151 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
53 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
83 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk50e4.woff
125 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk50e4.woff
149 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k50e4.woff
149 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k50e4.woff
123 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k50e4.woff
124 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
104 ms
scheipeter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
scheipeter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
scheipeter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scheipeter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scheipeter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scheipeter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scheipeter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: