Tools & Wizards About Us
scienceprotocols.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

scienceprotocols.org

Page Load Speed

826 ms in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

485 ms

Page Rendered

217 ms

scienceprotocols.org screenshot

About Website

Visit scienceprotocols.org now to see the best up-to-date Scienceprotocols content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scienceprotocols.org

Visit scienceprotocols.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Scienceprotocols.org page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 702 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scienceprotocols.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

scienceprotocols.org

124 ms

styles.css

68 ms

count.php

135 ms

php.gif

57 ms

php.gif

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Scienceprotocols.org, 45% (5 requests) were made to 000webhost.com and 27% (3 requests) were made to Stats.hosting24.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) relates to the external source 000webhost.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

15.7 kB

After Optimization

7.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scienceprotocols.org main page is 15.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 4.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 4.0 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 58% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 679 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scienceprotocols needs image optimization as it can save up to 679 B or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 715 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scienceprotocols.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scienceprotocols. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

scienceprotocols.org

scienceprotocols.org

124 ms

styles.css

styles.css

68 ms

count.php

count.php

135 ms

php.gif

php.gif

57 ms

php.gif

php.gif

190 ms

styles.css

styles.css

174 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

popup.js

popup.js

56 ms

hostinger-600x400-2.gif

hostinger-600x400-2.gif

54 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

55 ms

bg_popup.png

bg_popup.png

43 ms

SEO Factors

scienceprotocols.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scienceprotocols.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Scienceprotocols.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

scienceprotocols.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scienceprotocols. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: