Tools & Wizards About Us
screenleap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

screenleap.com

Free Screen Sharing and Online Meeting Software | Screenleap

Page Load Speed

686 ms in total

First Response

21 ms

Resources Loaded

510 ms

Page Rendered

155 ms

screenleap.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to screenleap.com homepage info - get ready to check Screenleap best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about screenleap.com

Free screen sharing using Screenleap. The fast, simple, and free way to share your screen instantly for online meetings, sales demos, and collaboration.

Visit screenleap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenleap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 665 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenleap.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenleap.com

21 ms

www.screenleap.com

24 ms

style.css

39 ms

jquery.min.js

61 ms

backbone-min.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Screenleap.com, 55% (21 requests) were made to D2e4kn0wu3avrd.cloudfront.net and 8% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (87 ms) relates to the external source Syndication.twitter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.5 kB (52%)

Content Size

894.2 kB

After Optimization

428.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenleap.com main page is 894.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 429.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 49.6 kB

  • Original 311.8 kB
  • After minification 262.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenleap needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 289.9 kB

  • Original 429.1 kB
  • After minification 429.1 kB
  • After compression 139.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 109.3 kB

  • Original 130.4 kB
  • After minification 128.2 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenleap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (44%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenleap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenleap.com

screenleap.com

21 ms

www.screenleap.com

www.screenleap.com

24 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

backbone-min.js

backbone-min.js

70 ms

tools.min.js

tools.min.js

75 ms

dev.min.js

dev.min.js

73 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

59 ms

screenleap.min.js

screenleap.min.js

73 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

73 ms

sprite.gif

sprite.gif

55 ms

header_input.png

header_input.png

62 ms

header_nav_border.jpg

header_nav_border.jpg

62 ms

screenleap.png

screenleap.png

54 ms

bg_ipad_bright2.jpg

bg_ipad_bright2.jpg

63 ms

share_your_screen_instantly.png

share_your_screen_instantly.png

55 ms

headline_arrow.png

headline_arrow.png

54 ms

share_button.png

share_button.png

55 ms

bg_gradient_gray.png

bg_gradient_gray.png

60 ms

img_laptop_share.png

img_laptop_share.png

57 ms

horizontal_split_line.png

horizontal_split_line.png

55 ms

press.png

press.png

57 ms

indicator.gif

indicator.gif

58 ms

ga.js

ga.js

42 ms

print.css

print.css

23 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

all.js

all.js

29 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

6 ms

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

42 ms

55 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

46 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

71 ms

ping

ping

58 ms

tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html

tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html

19 ms

like.php

like.php

52 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

67 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

71 ms

jot

jot

87 ms

Accessibility Review

screenleap.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

screenleap.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

screenleap.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenleap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Screenleap.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenleap.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenleap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: