Tools & Wizards About Us
screenshotcomparison.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

screenshotcomparison.com

Parked with Servage

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

628 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

161 ms

screenshotcomparison.com screenshot

About Website

Visit screenshotcomparison.com now to see the best up-to-date Screenshotcomparison content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about screenshotcomparison.com

Make comparison of screenshots

Visit screenshotcomparison.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenshotcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 628 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenshotcomparison.com performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenshotcomparison.com

628 ms

style.css

209 ms

sIFR-screen.css

219 ms

jquery.js

672 ms

cufon-yui.js

428 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Screenshotcomparison.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenshotcomparison.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.1 kB (57%)

Content Size

221.6 kB

After Optimization

95.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenshotcomparison.com main page is 221.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 157.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenshotcomparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 69% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 82.3 kB

  • Original 157.9 kB
  • After minification 156.1 kB
  • After compression 75.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.3 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenshotcomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (33%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenshotcomparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenshotcomparison.com

screenshotcomparison.com

628 ms

style.css

style.css

209 ms

sIFR-screen.css

sIFR-screen.css

219 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

672 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

428 ms

Diavlo_Book_400.font.js

Diavlo_Book_400.font.js

428 ms

checkboxShow.js

checkboxShow.js

311 ms

global.js

global.js

322 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

5 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

78 ms

bg.png

bg.png

127 ms

logo.png

logo.png

315 ms

header_info.png

header_info.png

213 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

130 ms

tab_left.png

tab_left.png

127 ms

tab_right.png

tab_right.png

625 ms

sidebar_bg.png

sidebar_bg.png

213 ms

donate.png

donate.png

215 ms

ca-pub-8304949562137337.js

ca-pub-8304949562137337.js

105 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

37 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

48 ms

information.png

information.png

291 ms

sidebar_end.png

sidebar_end.png

293 ms

liste_style.png

liste_style.png

286 ms

ga.js

ga.js

76 ms

osd.js

osd.js

31 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

42 ms

sIFR-print.css

sIFR-print.css

108 ms

Accessibility Review

screenshotcomparison.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

screenshotcomparison.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

screenshotcomparison.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenshotcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenshotcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenshotcomparison.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenshotcomparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: