3.7 sec in total
530 ms
2.6 sec
614 ms
Welcome to searchmarked.com homepage info - get ready to check Searchmarked best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about searchmarked.com
DropCatch.com helps you secure expiring domain names.
Visit searchmarked.comWe analyzed Searchmarked.com page load time and found that the first response time was 530 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
searchmarked.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
530 ms
110 ms
163 ms
76 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Searchmarked.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to T.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Searchmarked.com.
Page size can be reduced by 267.7 kB (35%)
767.3 kB
499.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Searchmarked.com main page is 767.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 393.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Searchmarked images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 191.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Searchmarked.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (64%)
70
25
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Searchmarked. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.searchmarked.com
530 ms
style.css
110 ms
jquery.js
163 ms
dd-formmailer.css
76 ms
index.php
279 ms
index.php
1316 ms
tw-sack.js
102 ms
polls-js-packed.js
113 ms
polls-css.css
140 ms
7 ms
jquery-1.2.3.pack.js
210 ms
library.js
169 ms
urchin.js
6 ms
mlt.js
10 ms
mlt.js
38 ms
sharethis.1ac33bc7d4476110a610f925104446ff.css
3 ms
bg.jpg
44 ms
offline-files.png
326 ms
125x125.gif
160 ms
image-3076940-10662153
20 ms
track_173375.gif
163 ms
header-right.png
42 ms
search.jpg
59 ms
rss-bg.jpg
45 ms
header-rss.jpg
49 ms
header-rss-posts.jpg
58 ms
header-rss-comments.jpg
154 ms
header-rss-email.jpg
155 ms
top-menu-arrow.gif
156 ms
logo.png
160 ms
menu-divider.jpg
157 ms
menu-hover.jpg
158 ms
sidebar-bg.png
160 ms
post-bg.gif
162 ms
post-top.png
161 ms
post-date.png
162 ms
post-comments.gif
162 ms
post-main-footer.jpg
163 ms
icon_wink.gif
173 ms
offline-files-delete-confirmation.png
215 ms
post-dashed-light.gif
150 ms
post-dashed-dark.gif
150 ms
post-tags.gif
161 ms
10662153-1449522017520
29 ms
share-icon-16x16.png
39 ms
post-bottom.png
155 ms
post-bullet.gif
161 ms
sidebar-top.png
157 ms
sidebar-headings-1.jpg
158 ms
sidebar-headings-2.jpg
160 ms
sidebar-dashed.gif
162 ms
sidebar-arrow.png
164 ms
comment-comunity.png
165 ms
footer.jpg
170 ms
sidebar-bottom.png
175 ms
footer-right-bg.jpg
177 ms
footer-right-top.jpg
177 ms
footer-right-bottom.jpg
192 ms
footer-right-arrow.png
206 ms
footer-links.jpg
206 ms
footer-bottom.jpg
214 ms
__utm.gif
77 ms
getSegment.php
23 ms
index.a8fc48294ca4cc10eb440189d9f22d7c.html
18 ms
125x125.gif
55 ms
st.125da8bfe70ad3e00a35a6e4c65d8bc5.js
16 ms
t.dhj
10 ms
t.dhj
25 ms
cm
30 ms
s-3271.xgi
10 ms
hbpix
25 ms
xrefid.xgi
6 ms
9 ms
5 ms
pixel
15 ms
pixel
14 ms
2981
34 ms
searchmarked.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
searchmarked.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
searchmarked.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Searchmarked.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Searchmarked.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
searchmarked.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Searchmarked. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: