29.8 sec in total
406 ms
17.7 sec
11.7 sec
Visit sedona.com now to see the best up-to-date Sedona content for Israel and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sedona.com
Visit sedona.comWe analyzed Sedona.com page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 29.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
sedona.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.3 s
0/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value2,210 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
406 ms
299 ms
445 ms
205 ms
303 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Sedona.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source Facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (45%)
2.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sedona.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sedona images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 995.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 995.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sedona.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (54%)
46
21
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sedona. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sedona.com
406 ms
www.sedona.com
299 ms
Home.asp
445 ms
css
205 ms
styles.css
303 ms
styles.css
477 ms
stylesLSC.css
479 ms
font-awesome.min.css
609 ms
sedona.css
465 ms
sedona-home.css
577 ms
jquery-ui.css
1001 ms
jquery-3.2.1.min.js
973 ms
jquery-ui.js
772 ms
scripts.js
972 ms
FlyoutMenu.aspx
953 ms
limelightjs-player.js
1966 ms
iphone-inline-video.js
952 ms
ls_limelight_player_custom.css
3368 ms
atc.min.js
3700 ms
WebResource.axd
3355 ms
WebResource.axd
3344 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.js
3326 ms
scripts.js
3325 ms
conversion.js
3290 ms
addthis_widget.js
3292 ms
ls_limelight_player_fix.js
3290 ms
limelightjs-player.js
1747 ms
analytics.js
223 ms
fbevents.js
609 ms
navArrow.png
229 ms
arrow.png
490 ms
menu.png
491 ms
search.png
491 ms
TheSedonaMethod-Header(1).jpg
491 ms
812d9a00-2aa1-47c7-85c5-20c69f27f857.jpg
490 ms
subscribe-button.png
490 ms
eacf2fb1-4e1d-43f5-9d9a-3f66b44f6e59.png
556 ms
185_Countries_banner-714.jpg
557 ms
geotrust.jpg
556 ms
bbb.jpg
555 ms
80fce33e-832c-42e4-9f71-257aa3d86979.jpg
276 ms
35150201-cebb-46fa-b7e2-ac1e1b7ffb24.jpg
3646 ms
4e6958b9-5cc4-471a-9cd4-644554071a6f.jpg
3644 ms
81142690-d158-4cdb-a176-6bf0bff4ba52.jpg
3545 ms
collect
701 ms
1420795498233131
648 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
595 ms
929 ms
3226 ms
4429 ms
_ate.track.config_resp
653 ms
300lo.json
427 ms
sedona.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sedona.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sedona.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sedona.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sedona.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sedona.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sedona. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: