1.4 sec in total
214 ms
907 ms
237 ms
Visit semanticmarker.com now to see the best up-to-date Semantic Marker content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about semanticmarker.com
Ingénieur, consultant SEO, je vous accompagne pour améliorer le référencement de votre site, augmenter votre clientêle et votre chiffre d'affaires.
Visit semanticmarker.comWe analyzed Semanticmarker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
semanticmarker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value280 ms
80/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
214 ms
361 ms
275 ms
274 ms
273 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Semanticmarker.com, 22% (5 requests) were made to Semanticmarker.net and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (361 ms) relates to the external source Semanticmarker.net.
Page size can be reduced by 213.8 kB (39%)
542.2 kB
328.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Semanticmarker.com main page is 542.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 281.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Semantic Marker needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 119.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Semanticmarker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (42%)
19
11
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Semantic Marker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
semanticmarker.com
214 ms
jquery.min.js
361 ms
skel.min.js
275 ms
skel-layers.min.js
274 ms
init.js
273 ms
sm.js
281 ms
style.css
34 ms
style-xlarge.css
68 ms
en_flag.jpg
65 ms
trafic-content.jpg
102 ms
graph-seo2.jpg
208 ms
neilpatel.jpg
99 ms
118218.jpg
96 ms
vogue.jpg
96 ms
wri.jpg
94 ms
bercy-2.jpg
206 ms
font-awesome.min.css
84 ms
css
74 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
24 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
67 ms
collect
36 ms
semanticmarker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
semanticmarker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
semanticmarker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Semanticmarker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Semanticmarker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
semanticmarker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Semantic Marker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: