3 sec in total
198 ms
2.1 sec
619 ms
Visit shapersimage.com now to see the best up-to-date SHAPERS IMAGE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shapersimage.com
At Shapers Image®, we take pride in elevating the aesthetic of your hats and caps. Our meticulously designed Shapers and Inserts are not only exceptionally soft and thin but also offer optimal support...
Visit shapersimage.comWe analyzed Shapersimage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
shapersimage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
198 ms
185 ms
79 ms
64 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Shapersimage.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Shapersimage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 297.4 kB (24%)
1.3 MB
960.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Shapersimage.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 703.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SHAPERS IMAGE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 217.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.0 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shapersimage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (31%)
54
37
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SHAPERS IMAGE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
shapersimage.com
198 ms
index.html
185 ms
sites.css
79 ms
fancybox.css
64 ms
main_style.css
162 ms
templateArtifacts.js
585 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
main.js
131 ms
ftl.js
110 ms
stl.js
109 ms
si.js
71 ms
badge.js
182 ms
340 ms
38750994.jpg
202 ms
search-light.png
69 ms
www.shapersimage.com
97 ms
search-wrap-bg.jpg
89 ms
main-bg.png
90 ms
1453912365.jpg
365 ms
rounded_corners.png
124 ms
nav-top.png
1216 ms
8983762.jpg
150 ms
2192754.gif
151 ms
3100189.jpg
190 ms
4536040.jpg
223 ms
6197516.gif
197 ms
2540983.gif
301 ms
6383056.jpg
273 ms
6026639.jpg
320 ms
1457274.jpg
344 ms
9028680.gif
372 ms
9182825.jpg
383 ms
5097861.jpg
398 ms
4594086.gif
434 ms
8642127.gif
438 ms
6071756.jpg
443 ms
5916828.jpg
472 ms
6242997.jpg
492 ms
7908999.jpg
726 ms
2295779.jpg
498 ms
9953534.jpg
501 ms
815786.jpg
531 ms
7089277.gif
575 ms
5514466.gif
564 ms
6016989.jpg
560 ms
1150868.jpg
589 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
sp.js
17 ms
smarticon
66 ms
counter.js
25 ms
t.php
59 ms
4.png
158 ms
1372542186ppc_img_ad188.jpg
148 ms
ga.js
23 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
__utm.gif
9 ms
shapersimage.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
shapersimage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
shapersimage.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shapersimage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shapersimage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shapersimage.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SHAPERS IMAGE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: