2.6 sec in total
904 ms
1.6 sec
153 ms
Visit sharksbay.com now to see the best up-to-date Sharks Bay content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharksbay.com
Visit sharksbay.comWe analyzed Sharksbay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 904 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sharksbay.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.7 s
84/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.529
14/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
904 ms
108 ms
137 ms
94 ms
593 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Sharksbay.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (1 request) were made to Admin.booking.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (904 ms) belongs to the original domain Sharksbay.com.
Page size can be reduced by 66.4 kB (19%)
343.3 kB
276.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Sharksbay.com main page is 343.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 259.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 702 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sharks Bay images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharksbay.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
24
24
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharks Bay. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
sharksbay.com
904 ms
style.css
108 ms
style.css
137 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
94 ms
logo.png
593 ms
logo.png
109 ms
title.gif
70 ms
Facebook.gif
108 ms
Flags.gif
131 ms
welcome2.jpg
225 ms
Hotel.jpg
140 ms
DivingCentre.jpg
145 ms
LiveAboard1.jpg
160 ms
GENERAL-eLEARNING.jpg
312 ms
botomLogos_03.gif
174 ms
botomLogos_05.gif
183 ms
botomLogos_07.gif
189 ms
botomLogos_09.gif
216 ms
botomLogos_11.gif
309 ms
botomLogos_13.gif
310 ms
Header.png
303 ms
like.php
96 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
29 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
18 ms
widget_v2.135.js
15 ms
sharksbay.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sharksbay.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
sharksbay.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharksbay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharksbay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sharksbay.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sharks Bay. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: