Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

sharktrust.org

The Shark Trust

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

541 ms

sharktrust.org screenshot

About Website

Visit sharktrust.org now to see the best up-to-date Shark Trust content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharktrust.org

Our mission is to safeguard a future for sharks, skates and rays through positive change. We achieve this through science, education, influence and action.

Visit sharktrust.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Sharktrust.org page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sharktrust.org performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.237

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sharktrust.org

341 ms

www.sharktrust.org

437 ms

jquery.min.js

69 ms

md5.js

122 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Sharktrust.org, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) belongs to the original domain Sharktrust.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 448.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Sharktrust.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 71.3 kB
  • After minification 68.5 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shark Trust images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 274.8 kB

  • Original 397.0 kB
  • After minification 348.3 kB
  • After compression 122.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 82.3 kB

  • Original 105.4 kB
  • After minification 95.7 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharktrust.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (34%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shark Trust. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sharktrust.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sharktrust.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sharktrust.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharktrust.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharktrust.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shark Trust. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: