4.3 sec in total
201 ms
3.3 sec
803 ms
Click here to check amazing Shed49 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shed49.no
Hastig, stabil og enkel. Vi har alt du trenger for å lage, beskytte og administrere din egen nettside til en god pris. Opptil 60% avslag nå!
Visit shed49.noWe analyzed Shed49.no page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
shed49.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value6,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.847
4/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
201 ms
192 ms
347 ms
199 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Shed49.no, 69% (51 requests) were made to Shed49.com and 26% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Shed49.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (45%)
2.3 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Shed49.no main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shed49 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 454.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 454.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 495.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shed49.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 495.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (67%)
51
17
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shed49. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shed49.no
201 ms
shed49.com
192 ms
www.shed49.com
347 ms
language-selector.css
199 ms
settings.css
238 ms
navigation.css
197 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
216 ms
cms-navigation.css
214 ms
css
23 ms
css
36 ms
css
44 ms
style.css
416 ms
shortcodes.css
409 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
398 ms
magnific_popup.css
400 ms
default.css
411 ms
datatables.min.css
449 ms
whmpress.css
605 ms
jquery.js
713 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
621 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
705 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
617 ms
revolution.addon.whiteboard.min.js
632 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
867 ms
comment-reply.min.js
866 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
866 ms
custom.js
866 ms
smoothscroll.js
916 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
914 ms
waypoints.min.js
989 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1005 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
1101 ms
whmpress.js
1018 ms
jquery.quicksearch.js
1089 ms
datatables.min.js
1188 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1183 ms
sitepress.js
1208 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
1207 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1093 ms
Abstract-White-Wallpaper-Picture.jpg
1269 ms
bluelogo.png
623 ms
1080x440-Man-on-roof.jpg
803 ms
1801x440-Man-with-glasses.jpg
724 ms
1801x440-Datacentre.jpg
821 ms
1801x440-Business-man.jpg
890 ms
1801x440-Girl-with-headphones.jpg
976 ms
tools_120px.png
913 ms
global_120px.png
996 ms
chat_120px.png
1014 ms
cloudlinux-logo.png
1091 ms
litespeed-logo.png
1106 ms
cpanel-logo.png
1174 ms
subscribe-loader.gif
1189 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
27 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
29 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
29 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
28 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
38 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
38 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
26 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
54 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
56 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
56 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
1394 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
53 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
55 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
55 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
55 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
55 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
57 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
55 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
55 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
56 ms
pastels-wordpress-art-e1457529880771.jpg
1247 ms
shed49.no accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
shed49.no SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
NB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shed49.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shed49.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shed49.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shed49. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: