7.3 sec in total
715 ms
6 sec
553 ms
Visit sheffield-systems.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Sheffield Systems content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sheffield-systems.co.uk
Reliable IT Support and Telecoms company in Sheffield with 5 star google reviews. IT Support, Cloud and Telecoms all from a single supplier.
Visit sheffield-systems.co.ukWe analyzed Sheffield-systems.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 715 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sheffield-systems.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
715 ms
34 ms
376 ms
312 ms
365 ms
Our browser made a total of 130 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Sheffield-systems.co.uk, 14% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sheffield-systems.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 127.1 kB (7%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Sheffield-systems.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 918.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sheffield Systems images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sheffield-systems.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (80%)
107
21
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sheffield Systems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 70 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sheffield-systems.co.uk
715 ms
css
34 ms
style.min.css
376 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
312 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
365 ms
classic-themes.min.css
317 ms
styles.css
287 ms
style.css
383 ms
font-awesome.min.css
565 ms
style.min.css
586 ms
style.css
592 ms
stylesheet.min.css
823 ms
print.css
647 ms
style_dynamic.css
662 ms
responsive.min.css
926 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
868 ms
js_composer.min.css
1056 ms
custom_css.css
933 ms
jetpack.css
1028 ms
jquery.min.js
1158 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1113 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1314 ms
index.js
1215 ms
index.js
1278 ms
qode-like.min.js
1279 ms
core.min.js
1325 ms
accordion.min.js
1441 ms
menu.min.js
1441 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1512 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1568 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1570 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1605 ms
hooks.min.js
1762 ms
i18n.min.js
1604 ms
a11y.min.js
1791 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1791 ms
controlgroup.min.js
1792 ms
api.js
43 ms
e-202404.js
17 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
1849 ms
button.min.js
1668 ms
datepicker.min.js
1844 ms
mouse.min.js
1846 ms
resizable.min.js
1825 ms
draggable.min.js
1785 ms
dialog.min.js
1840 ms
droppable.min.js
1681 ms
progressbar.min.js
1660 ms
selectable.min.js
1836 ms
sortable.min.js
1780 ms
slider.min.js
1778 ms
spinner.min.js
1611 ms
tooltip.min.js
1649 ms
tabs.min.js
1583 ms
effect.min.js
1765 ms
effect-blind.min.js
1668 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
1632 ms
effect-clip.min.js
1635 ms
ga.js
202 ms
effect-drop.min.js
1296 ms
effect-explode.min.js
1418 ms
effect-fade.min.js
1509 ms
effect-fold.min.js
1596 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPErd5aDdvg.ttf
203 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjd5aDdvg.ttf
203 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPCbd5aDdvg.ttf
205 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPPjd5aDdvg.ttf
204 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjc5aDdvg.ttf
206 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPKba5aDdvg.ttf
205 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPJ_a5aDdvg.ttf
207 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPPja5aDdvg.ttf
205 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPNHa5aDdvg.ttf
208 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
206 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
210 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
207 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
210 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
210 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
210 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
210 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
210 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
210 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
1579 ms
__utm.gif
181 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
1561 ms
effect-size.min.js
1470 ms
effect-scale.min.js
1511 ms
collect
103 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1494 ms
effect-slide.min.js
1574 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
1554 ms
plugins.js
1785 ms
ga-audiences
24 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
1651 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
1449 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
1527 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1864 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1851 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1808 ms
jquery.stretch.js
1801 ms
TweenLite.min.js
1609 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
1614 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
1608 ms
default_dynamic.js
1593 ms
default.min.js
1546 ms
custom_js.js
1655 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1714 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1632 ms
index.js
1625 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1883 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
1771 ms
SBS-logo-dark-new-3.png
1670 ms
logo_white.png
1759 ms
logo_black.png
1704 ms
SBS-logo-dark-4.png
1649 ms
Office365-image-10.jpg
2009 ms
IT_Services.jpg
1937 ms
structured-cabling-new.jpg
1998 ms
polycom-voIP.jpg
1685 ms
VoIP-group.jpg
1890 ms
IT-support-contracts.jpg
1630 ms
cloud-solutions.jpg
1863 ms
slider-office365-1.jpg
1694 ms
office365-video-bg.jpg
2184 ms
structured-cabling-new-1.jpg
1889 ms
Google-rating.png
1822 ms
stars-1.png
1782 ms
tab-image-1.jpg
1794 ms
recaptcha__en.js
134 ms
WidgetScript
124 ms
gridtile.png
408 ms
sheffield-systems.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sheffield-systems.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sheffield-systems.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sheffield-systems.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sheffield-systems.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sheffield-systems.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sheffield Systems. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: