6.7 sec in total
2.4 sec
4 sec
366 ms
Welcome to shippingcostarica.net homepage info - get ready to check Shippingcostarica best content right away, or after learning these important things about shippingcostarica.net
Costa Rica's #1 Shipping and Relocation Company
Visit shippingcostarica.netWe analyzed Shippingcostarica.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
shippingcostarica.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value21.5 s
0/100
25%
Value19.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value1.26
1/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
2355 ms
52 ms
173 ms
210 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Shippingcostarica.net, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Shippingcostarica.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (44%)
2.4 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Shippingcostarica.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 985.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shippingcostarica images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 563.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 563.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 359.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shippingcostarica.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 359.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (56%)
66
29
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shippingcostarica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shippingcostarica.net
2355 ms
webfont.js
52 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
style.css
210 ms
media.css
190 ms
animate-custom.css
187 ms
settings.css
206 ms
captions.css
325 ms
layerslider.css
321 ms
flexslider.css
335 ms
style.css
330 ms
jetpack.css
485 ms
jquery.js
355 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
330 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
496 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
496 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
490 ms
jquerytransit.js
494 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
594 ms
css
30 ms
fontawesome.css
639 ms
upop_simple.js
711 ms
js
51 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
28 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
657 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
658 ms
comment-reply.min.js
485 ms
modernizr-min.js
657 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
665 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
665 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
665 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
664 ms
gmap-min.js
735 ms
main-min.js
656 ms
wp-embed.min.js
786 ms
e-201639.js
21 ms
ga.js
74 ms
livechattop.png
314 ms
costa_icon-2.png
322 ms
costaricashippingcontainer.jpg
322 ms
boxbg.png
322 ms
vehicle-shipping-to-costa-rica2.jpg
323 ms
Costa-Rica-Shipping-E-Book2.jpg
521 ms
Shipping-Costa-Rica2.jpg
533 ms
vehicle-shipping-costa-rica-video-1.jpg
521 ms
Costa-Rica-Container-Shipping-Video-2.jpg
520 ms
Shipping-Pitfalls-to-Avoid-Video-3.jpg
518 ms
costa_icon1.png
521 ms
livechat.png
521 ms
wtwJ9UuQFa_G0mIQrZmRFaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
130 ms
F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
290 ms
qWcF1HrhZF7JxN3QKqsMFwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
302 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
304 ms
8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
302 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
630 ms
__utm.gif
227 ms
facebook.png
513 ms
bg-popup.png
513 ms
twitter.png
513 ms
shadow-top.png
513 ms
shadow-bottom.png
526 ms
anchora.png
670 ms
dashboarda.png
677 ms
trucka.png
607 ms
sep-shadow.png
674 ms
twitter-icon.png
668 ms
facebook.png
670 ms
twitter.png
753 ms
common.js
161 ms
util.js
171 ms
geocoder.js
169 ms
mobile_menu_bg.png
458 ms
g.gif
45 ms
shippingcostarica.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shippingcostarica.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shippingcostarica.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shippingcostarica.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Shippingcostarica.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shippingcostarica.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shippingcostarica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: