4.5 sec in total
346 ms
3.8 sec
318 ms
Click here to check amazing Sig content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sig.pl
✔ Strona główna
Visit sig.plWe analyzed Sig.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sig.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value2,480 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.137
79/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
346 ms
1095 ms
459 ms
26 ms
562 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Sig.pl, 6% (7 requests) were made to M.goadservices.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to T.goadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sig.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (41%)
2.9 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Sig.pl main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sig images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 656.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 656.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 399.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sig.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 399.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (61%)
103
40
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sig.pl
346 ms
www.sig.pl
1095 ms
font-awesome.min.css
459 ms
css
26 ms
bootstrap.min.css
562 ms
font-awesome.min.css
477 ms
styles.css
446 ms
magnific-popup.css
475 ms
go_portfolio_styles.css
728 ms
settings.css
718 ms
catalogue-styles.css
724 ms
style.css
627 ms
lightbox.min.pl_PL.css
725 ms
style.css
748 ms
footable.core.min.css
750 ms
footable.metro.min.css
821 ms
suppa_frontend_style.css
823 ms
suppa_custom_style.css
828 ms
style-min.css
1171 ms
hover-min.css
857 ms
jsapi
25 ms
jquery.js
1068 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
931 ms
bootstrap.min.js
932 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1159 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1072 ms
wpc-front.js
1037 ms
scripts.js
1040 ms
modernizr.full.min.js
1146 ms
footable.min.js
1149 ms
footable.sort.min.js
1232 ms
footable.filter.min.js
1232 ms
footable.paginate.min.js
1254 ms
gray.css
1257 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
952 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
853 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
823 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
827 ms
styles.css
891 ms
suppa_js_settings.js
895 ms
core.min.js
907 ms
effect.min.js
943 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
a31c72a2-3e06-4b90-a105-76132056afcb
197 ms
suppa_frontend.min.js
944 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
914 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
861 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
773 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
779 ms
go_portfolio_scripts.js
807 ms
wp-lightbox-2.min.js
809 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
842 ms
carousel.js
845 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
logo.jpg
440 ms
slajder_wieszak.png
901 ms
slajder1.jpg
949 ms
slajder2.jpg
1045 ms
slajder3.jpg
1206 ms
sucha-zabudowa.jpg
446 ms
sufity.jpg
446 ms
klimatyzacja.jpg
550 ms
izolacje.jpg
664 ms
chemia.jpg
663 ms
dachy.jpg
762 ms
image_194.png
771 ms
image_201.png
871 ms
ikona-pobieranie.png
881 ms
image_212.png
976 ms
image_280.jpg
1249 ms
braas-logo-150x75.jpg
1011 ms
atc-logoshowcase.jpg
1039 ms
rector-logo-150x45.jpg
1071 ms
AMF-systemy-sufitowe-200x65.png
1111 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1450 ms
A3RCvTYAAAA=
14 ms
collect
5 ms
collect
53 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1230 ms
armstrong-200x200.jpg
1095 ms
fermacell-logo-200x73.jpg
1137 ms
isover-200x104.png
1186 ms
Kabe-farby-e1408443700585.jpg
1183 ms
knauf-200x200.jpg
1200 ms
baumit_logo_NOWE-150x144.jpg
1192 ms
prefix-200x200.jpg
1166 ms
rockwool-200x200.jpg
1193 ms
ursa-150x105.jpg
1200 ms
siniat-sucha-zabudowa-150x64.jpg
1233 ms
logo_alpolgips1_SIG-150x82.jpg
1217 ms
129 ms
loader.gif
1059 ms
bullet.png
1072 ms
large_left.png
1094 ms
a31c72a2-3e06-4b90-a105-76132056afcb
194 ms
large_right.png
1132 ms
bx_loader.gif
1127 ms
controls.png
1134 ms
39 ms
a31c72a2-3e06-4b90-a105-76132056afcb
102 ms
a31c72a2-3e06-4b90-a105-76132056afcb
103 ms
pixel
21 ms
Pug
30 ms
56 ms
doubleclick
194 ms
pubmatic
188 ms
smart
192 ms
netsprint
111 ms
pixel
445 ms
ibillboard
104 ms
adform
103 ms
all4
98 ms
sig.pl accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sig.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sig.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sig.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sig.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sig.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sig. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: