Tools & Wizards About Us
signalsimulation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

signalsimulation.com

Railway Signalling Simulations - SignalSimulation

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

428 ms

signalsimulation.com screenshot

About Website

Visit signalsimulation.com now to see the best up-to-date Signal Simulation content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about signalsimulation.com

Railway signalling simulations and product help and support from SIGNALSOFT Rail Consultancy Ltd.

Visit signalsimulation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Signalsimulation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

signalsimulation.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

signalsimulation.com

352 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

minify-b1-cookie-notice-front-66b63a64cb2a13eb444e6c622bf32ca3.css

251 ms

css

25 ms

jquery.js

262 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Signalsimulation.com, 28% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 732.1 kB (69%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

335.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Signalsimulation.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 517.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 41.4 kB
  • After minification 38.2 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 679 B

  • Original 147.0 kB
  • After minification 146.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signal Simulation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 243.3 kB

  • Original 361.3 kB
  • After minification 361.2 kB
  • After compression 117.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 456.4 kB

  • Original 517.5 kB
  • After minification 467.8 kB
  • After compression 61.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signalsimulation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 456.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signal Simulation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

signalsimulation.com

signalsimulation.com

352 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

minify-b1-cookie-notice-front-66b63a64cb2a13eb444e6c622bf32ca3.css

minify-b1-cookie-notice-front-66b63a64cb2a13eb444e6c622bf32ca3.css

251 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

262 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

181 ms

minify-b1-cookie-notice-front-400b6734ebce3d94ee8fc51c9754e158.js

minify-b1-cookie-notice-front-400b6734ebce3d94ee8fc51c9754e158.js

184 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

60 ms

minify-b1-et-builder-modules-global-functions-script-4f7559882938fbfce55760e8191de3c1.js

minify-b1-et-builder-modules-global-functions-script-4f7559882938fbfce55760e8191de3c1.js

273 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

3 ms

minify-b1-salvattore-3ec387d509d8a42e23547a80914668f4.js

minify-b1-salvattore-3ec387d509d8a42e23547a80914668f4.js

334 ms

e-201610.js

e-201610.js

4 ms

style.css

style.css

342 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

123 ms

rh_full.jpg

rh_full.jpg

1099 ms

emaf_full.jpg

emaf_full.jpg

1219 ms

sigsimlogo.png

sigsimlogo.png

117 ms

generic_4.jpg

generic_4.jpg

377 ms

divider_1.jpg

divider_1.jpg

316 ms

subscribe-loader.gif

subscribe-loader.gif

255 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

69 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

27 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

27 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

27 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

27 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

424 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf

24 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf

27 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf

28 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

28 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf

26 ms

collect

collect

136 ms

collect

collect

147 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

61 ms

services.css

services.css

82 ms

g.gif

g.gif

3 ms

Accessibility Review

signalsimulation.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

signalsimulation.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

signalsimulation.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signalsimulation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signalsimulation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

signalsimulation.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Signal Simulation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: