22.4 sec in total
691 ms
21.4 sec
310 ms
Welcome to signetfence.com homepage info - get ready to check Signet Fence best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about signetfence.com
Shop for All of Your Fencing & Railing Online at Signet Fence. Low Prices on Thousands of Fencing & Railing Products. Where the Pro's Go to Buy Fencing Online.
Visit signetfence.comWe analyzed Signetfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 21.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
signetfence.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.129
82/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
691 ms
179 ms
182 ms
183 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Signetfence.com, 29% (20 requests) were made to Cdn3.volusion.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Upfront.thefind.com.
Page size can be reduced by 229.2 kB (31%)
751.5 kB
522.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Signetfence.com main page is 751.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 432.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signet Fence images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 124.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signetfence.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (44%)
66
37
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signet Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
Default.asp
691 ms
milonic_src.js
179 ms
Menu_Popout_Styles.js
182 ms
Menu_Popout_Data.js
183 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
81 ms
jquery-ui.css
106 ms
default.css
182 ms
volusion.js
184 ms
soft_add.js
321 ms
soft_add.css
251 ms
soft_add_mult.js
251 ms
javascripts.js
330 ms
Imports.css
254 ms
getseal
94 ms
adsbygoogle.js
33 ms
mmenudom.js
207 ms
Colors.css
78 ms
Content_Area.css
80 ms
Template.css
81 ms
Navigation.css
79 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
PB-K-1.jpg
303 ms
OZ-PULL-1.jpg
505 ms
KANT-1.jpg
667 ms
PVT-5-1.jpg
585 ms
OZ-IS-FBL-1.jpg
606 ms
LLAAB-1.jpg
672 ms
S-112-Box-1.jpg
597 ms
MLTPS2BGA-1.jpg
728 ms
GC-253-1.jpg
717 ms
TP-925-1.jpg
788 ms
TCAMA2RND-1.jpg
824 ms
BT-84014-1.jpg
831 ms
LX-NOI-1.jpg
913 ms
BT-70315-1.jpg
886 ms
LLP1S-K-1.jpg
838 ms
BT-84005-1.jpg
957 ms
PVT-6-1.jpg
1028 ms
MLVPS2BGA-1.jpg
1012 ms
LX-NOS-1.jpg
949 ms
LLAA-1.jpg
1060 ms
Logo.png
187 ms
signet_seal.png
188 ms
free-shipping.png
187 ms
seal_volusion2.png
112 ms
cc_logo5.gif
184 ms
fittings-banner.jpg
527 ms
clear1x1.gif
204 ms
Icon_FreeShipping_Small.gif
261 ms
star4.5.gif
305 ms
star5.gif
305 ms
star1.gif
305 ms
fence-post-sign.jpg
482 ms
help-center-heading.png
599 ms
Menu1_Bullet.gif
462 ms
Menu1_Bullet_End.gif
462 ms
search_bg.gif
465 ms
collect
36 ms
Grid_Divider_Vertical.gif
534 ms
Grid_Divider_Horizontal.gif
522 ms
ca-pub-1393152019532245.js
36 ms
zrt_lookup.html
39 ms
show_ads_impl.js
102 ms
upfront-badgeinit.js
20024 ms
ads
242 ms
osd.js
53 ms
abg.js
64 ms
signetfence.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
signetfence.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
signetfence.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signetfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Signetfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
signetfence.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Signet Fence. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: