5.7 sec in total
230 ms
5.1 sec
359 ms
Click here to check amazing Sim On content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sim-on.net
Simon Muthusi is a seasoned professional. Speciality in digital product management, systems thinking and product’s roadmap, design and software development, team management, digital strategy and big d...
Visit sim-on.netWe analyzed Sim-on.net page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
sim-on.net performance score
230 ms
2065 ms
323 ms
282 ms
394 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Sim-on.net, 21% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sim-on.net.
Page size can be reduced by 980.9 kB (73%)
1.3 MB
367.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Sim-on.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 903.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.7 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 729.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sim-on.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 729.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (84%)
61
10
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sim On. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sim-on.net
230 ms
sim-on.net
2065 ms
analytics.js
323 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
282 ms
style.min.css
394 ms
frontend-grid.css
488 ms
frontend.css
444 ms
font-awesome.min.css
508 ms
bootstrap.min.css
535 ms
normalize.css
489 ms
owl.carousel.css
532 ms
transition-animations.css
567 ms
animate.css
541 ms
magnific-popup.css
538 ms
material-design-iconic-font.min.css
563 ms
dashicons.min.css
597 ms
linecons.css
778 ms
entypo.css
606 ms
lnr.css
608 ms
typcn.css
609 ms
unycon.css
612 ms
material-design-iconic-font.css
687 ms
main.css
766 ms
customization.css.php
790 ms
background.css
698 ms
styles.css
697 ms
css
338 ms
frontend.min.js
780 ms
jquery.js
939 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
788 ms
iframe_api
384 ms
scripts.js
894 ms
adsbygoogle.js
359 ms
modernizr.custom.js
925 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
924 ms
validator.js
1258 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1199 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
1481 ms
masonry.min.js
1480 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
1474 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1474 ms
api.js
289 ms
pages-switcher.js
1467 ms
linkid.js
129 ms
main.js
1302 ms
collect
37 ms
collect
93 ms
core.js
1303 ms
ga-audiences
92 ms
transition.js
1214 ms
background.js
1204 ms
background.init.js
1197 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1173 ms
www-widgetapi.js
530 ms
aveo-bg.png
603 ms
simon-copy.png
1819 ms
steamaco-copy.png
1477 ms
Screen-Shot-2020-04-11-at-13.52.04.png
1478 ms
show_ads_impl.js
476 ms
zrt_lookup.html
438 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e2fxHiD.ttf
848 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e2fxHiD.ttf
971 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e2fxHiD.ttf
970 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e2fxHiD.ttf
969 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e2fxHiD.ttf
970 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e2fxHiD.ttf
971 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e2fxHiD.ttf
986 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e2fxHiD.ttf
987 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_dJE3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
987 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_c5H3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
986 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_epG3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
985 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_bZF3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
987 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_ZpC3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
1111 ms
JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459WlhziTh89Y.ttf
1109 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_cJD3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
1112 ms
JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_aZA3gnD-_x3rCs.ttf
1111 ms
JTUQjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_QpRyS7j0dR9pA.ttf
1112 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
968 ms
cookie.js
648 ms
integrator.js
632 ms
recaptcha__en.js
589 ms
sim-on.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sim-on.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sim-on.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sim-on.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sim On. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: