9.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
7 sec
684 ms
Welcome to siracel.com homepage info - get ready to check Sirac El best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about siracel.com
Web Arayüz Tasarımcısı
Visit siracel.comWe analyzed Siracel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
siracel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
55/100
10%
Value6.8 s
8/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value450 ms
64/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
1374 ms
24 ms
288 ms
291 ms
295 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Siracel.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 538.1 kB (44%)
1.2 MB
680.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Siracel.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 474.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sirac El images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 301.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 301.3 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siracel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (57%)
83
36
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sirac El. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.siracel.com
1374 ms
css
24 ms
styles.css
288 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
291 ms
jquery.dop.WallGridGallery.css
295 ms
swipebox.min.css
297 ms
style.css
448 ms
responsive.css
425 ms
font-awesome.min.css
580 ms
jetpack.css
583 ms
jquery.js
729 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
515 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
564 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.min.js
748 ms
jquery.dop.WallGridGallery.js
817 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
840 ms
front.js
722 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
868 ms
viva-zoom.css
864 ms
viva-zoom-mini.js
1015 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1026 ms
adsbygoogle.js
22 ms
photon.js
758 ms
jquery.form.min.js
979 ms
scripts.js
797 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
802 ms
scripts.js
977 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1031 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
1452024033.jpg
1745 ms
feature11.jpg
974 ms
Untitled_8_51.jpg
980 ms
60e0c9ed47e56b3665cb10b95d28a990
218 ms
siracellogo1.png
506 ms
rss.png
219 ms
uzun-hikaye1.jpg
1672 ms
pro-designers61.jpg
1612 ms
sehitler.jpg
1229 ms
Untitled_8_51.jpg
1072 ms
pro-designers61.jpg
1643 ms
1_611.jpg
2205 ms
165.jpg
1612 ms
fetih_1453_fetih_1453_filmi_bu_aksam_fox_tv_ekranlarinda_kacirmayin_h24631.jpg
1013 ms
fransa-bayrak1.jpg
1107 ms
renk1.jpg
1640 ms
1452024033.jpg
1708 ms
165.jpg
2132 ms
banner-web.png
3829 ms
fetih_1453_fetih_1453_filmi_bu_aksam_fox_tv_ekranlarinda_kacirmayin_h24631.jpg
2473 ms
haber.jpg
3853 ms
selkirk-college-rdi-technologies-banner-slide1.jpg
986 ms
feature11.jpg
977 ms
selkirk-college-rdi-technologies-banner-slide1.jpg
974 ms
lyvcXAp_ih3ehVX3UeaIavesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
97 ms
QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpF02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
98 ms
ca-pub-8934597676498595.js
202 ms
zrt_lookup.html
204 ms
show_ads_impl.js
145 ms
opacity-10.png
191 ms
s-right-s2.png
473 ms
s-left.png
472 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
720 ms
ads
439 ms
osd.js
39 ms
ads
400 ms
hovercard.css
78 ms
services.css
87 ms
ads
286 ms
g.gif
6 ms
css
111 ms
m_js_controller.js
52 ms
abg.js
64 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
164 ms
13141286074307775015
73 ms
s
88 ms
x_button_blue2.png
92 ms
favicon
144 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
59 ms
2199116833792721228
58 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
27 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
113 ms
activeview
24 ms
activeview
38 ms
rounded-white.png
165 ms
zoomout.cur
146 ms
loader.white.gif
153 ms
ui
59 ms
siracel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
siracel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
siracel.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
TR
TR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siracel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siracel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siracel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sirac El. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: