Tools & Wizards About Us
sitejet.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

sitejet.io

Powerful Website Builder for Agencies | Sitejet

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

3.4 sec

sitejet.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sitejet content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sitejet.io

Powerful Web Design with Sitejet page builder. Create, Host, and Manage Your Websites Effortlessly with Sitejet Studio.

Visit sitejet.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitejet.io page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitejet.io performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,830 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitejet.io

235 ms

www.sitejet.io

712 ms

en

13 ms

app.min.1727252903.css

7 ms

custom.240620103216.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Sitejet.io, 75% (47 requests) were made to Inter-cdn.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (712 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitejet.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 598.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

14.7 MB

After Optimization

14.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sitejet.io main page is 14.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 204.8 kB

  • Original 276.6 kB
  • After minification 276.2 kB
  • After compression 71.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 369.4 kB

  • Original 14.2 MB
  • After minification 13.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitejet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 310.8 kB
  • After minification 310.8 kB
  • After compression 286.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (9%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

51

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitejet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sitejet.io

sitejet.io

235 ms

www.sitejet.io

www.sitejet.io

712 ms

en

en

13 ms

app.min.1727252903.css

app.min.1727252903.css

7 ms

custom.240620103216.css

custom.240620103216.css

23 ms

tq0r1tq69w.jsonp

tq0r1tq69w.jsonp

195 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

512 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

230 ms

app.bundle.1727252909.js

app.bundle.1727252909.js

169 ms

custom.240708111308.js

custom.240708111308.js

170 ms

Sitejet_CoBrandLogo_Primary.svg

Sitejet_CoBrandLogo_Primary.svg

448 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

444 ms

swatch

swatch

370 ms

Herobackgroundnooverlay1.png

Herobackgroundnooverlay1.png

402 ms

Heroimage1.png

Heroimage1.png

403 ms

layout_screen.png

layout_screen.png

396 ms

Image3.png

Image3.png

409 ms

Website-focus-on-Pages-SEO.png

Website-focus-on-Pages-SEO.png

417 ms

partner_steps.png

partner_steps.png

405 ms

Group151.png

Group151.png

405 ms

Protemplatesimage1.png

Protemplatesimage1.png

411 ms

lato-regular-webfont.woff

lato-regular-webfont.woff

334 ms

lato-light-webfont.woff

lato-light-webfont.woff

359 ms

lato-bold-webfont.woff

lato-bold-webfont.woff

360 ms

fontawesome-webfont.f691f37e.woff

fontawesome-webfont.f691f37e.woff

672 ms

g2-crowd-logo2.png

g2-crowd-logo2.png

39 ms

SourceForge_logo_transparent3.png

SourceForge_logo_transparent3.png

41 ms

capterra-inc-vector-logo1.png

capterra-inc-vector-logo1.png

41 ms

appsumo-logo2.png

appsumo-logo2.png

45 ms

dc-logo2.png

dc-logo2.png

44 ms

G2footerlogo.png

G2footerlogo.png

46 ms

Sourceforgefooterlogo.png

Sourceforgefooterlogo.png

47 ms

Capterrafooterlogo.png

Capterrafooterlogo.png

48 ms

Appsumofooterlogo.png

Appsumofooterlogo.png

49 ms

dc-logo2.png

dc-logo2.png

49 ms

cPanel_1.png

cPanel_1.png

57 ms

Pleskwholeimage.png

Pleskwholeimage.png

57 ms

wishes_color.png

wishes_color.png

51 ms

wishes.png

wishes.png

51 ms

Prepareprojectsimage.png

Prepareprojectsimage.png

52 ms

Prepareprojectsimage.png

Prepareprojectsimage.png

684 ms

Image2.png

Image2.png

59 ms

Image1.png

Image1.png

66 ms

Intuitivesitecreationimage.png

Intuitivesitecreationimage.png

63 ms

Textinputimage.png

Textinputimage.png

60 ms

Createnewwebsiteimage.png

Createnewwebsiteimage.png

60 ms

Changeuploadedimageimage.png

Changeuploadedimageimage.png

60 ms

template_screen.png

template_screen.png

67 ms

Createandlaunchimage.png

Createandlaunchimage.png

101 ms

Screenshot2024-02-29at17.421.png

Screenshot2024-02-29at17.421.png

71 ms

SEO-URL-multilanguage1.png

SEO-URL-multilanguage1.png

72 ms

Screenshot2024-02-29at17.422.png

Screenshot2024-02-29at17.422.png

100 ms

Website-focus-on-Pages-SEO.png

Website-focus-on-Pages-SEO.png

81 ms

Todoimage.png

Todoimage.png

77 ms

Ticketsimage.png

Ticketsimage.png

74 ms

Timetableimage.png

Timetableimage.png

72 ms

Statusimage.png

Statusimage.png

71 ms

Manageandsupportimage.png

Manageandsupportimage.png

76 ms

Image2.png

Image2.png

72 ms

Image1.png

Image1.png

69 ms

Addcontentwitheaseimage.png

Addcontentwitheaseimage.png

75 ms

Group72.png

Group72.png

70 ms

Websiteplanetfooterlogo.png

Websiteplanetfooterlogo.png

68 ms

Accessibility Review

sitejet.io accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sitejet.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sitejet.io SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitejet.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitejet.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitejet.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sitejet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: