Tools & Wizards About Us
sitelark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

sitelark.com

Sitelark - Home

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

543 ms

sitelark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sitelark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sitelark.com

SiteLark is committed to becoming the best-in-class provider of reservoir management services and software tools that enable oil and gas industry customers to make the best decisions for optimal recov...

Visit sitelark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitelark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitelark.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

sitelark.com

1369 ms

k2.css

28 ms

css

674 ms

css

692 ms

mootools-core.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Sitelark.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitelark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (20%)

Content Size

6.4 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sitelark.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 56.4 kB
  • After minification 37.5 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.9 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 753.6 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sitelark needs image optimization as it can save up to 753.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 261.5 kB

  • Original 382.0 kB
  • After minification 330.8 kB
  • After compression 120.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 244.7 kB

  • Original 290.9 kB
  • After minification 249.6 kB
  • After compression 46.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitelark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (68%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitelark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sitelark.com

sitelark.com

1369 ms

k2.css

k2.css

28 ms

css

css

674 ms

css

css

692 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

31 ms

core.js

core.js

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

31 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

33 ms

k2.js

k2.js

32 ms

caption.js

caption.js

32 ms

js

js

728 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

39 ms

system.css

system.css

35 ms

general.css

general.css

37 ms

template.css

template.css

44 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

36 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

animo.min.js

animo.min.js

39 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

54 ms

sitelark.js

sitelark.js

43 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

47 ms

jgestures.min.js

jgestures.min.js

51 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

56 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

54 ms

jquery.sidr.light.css

jquery.sidr.light.css

57 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

75 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

60 ms

sitelark.css

sitelark.css

62 ms

system.css

system.css

16 ms

font.css

font.css

122 ms

SITELARK_Logo.png

SITELARK_Logo.png

18 ms

logo.png

logo.png

46 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

47 ms

00_BANNER_HOME1.jpg

00_BANNER_HOME1.jpg

77 ms

00_BANNER_HOME2.jpg

00_BANNER_HOME2.jpg

59 ms

00_BANNER_HOME3.jpg

00_BANNER_HOME3.jpg

102 ms

about-sitelark-bg.png

about-sitelark-bg.png

33 ms

products-graph-bg.png

products-graph-bg.png

101 ms

li-bg-black.png

li-bg-black.png

45 ms

resources-casestudies-bg.jpg

resources-casestudies-bg.jpg

46 ms

resources-publications-bg.jpg

resources-publications-bg.jpg

49 ms

resources-whitepapers-bg.jpg

resources-whitepapers-bg.jpg

75 ms

dinweb-regular.woff

dinweb-regular.woff

27 ms

dinweb-bold.woff

dinweb-bold.woff

44 ms

dinweb-black.woff

dinweb-black.woff

44 ms

dinweb-light.woff

dinweb-light.woff

55 ms

SEO Factors

sitelark.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitelark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitelark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitelark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitelark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: