3.1 sec in total
143 ms
2.3 sec
682 ms
Visit sitelio.com now to see the best up-to-date Sitelio content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitelio.com
Answer a few questions about your business, blog, or portfolio and our A.I. builder will start building a site based on your answers. No coding required.
Visit sitelio.comWe analyzed Sitelio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sitelio.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value670 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.142
78/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
143 ms
1447 ms
58 ms
34 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Sitelio.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitelio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 226.7 kB (9%)
2.6 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Sitelio.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitelio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitelio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (24%)
25
19
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitelio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitelio.com
143 ms
www.sitelio.com
1447 ms
css
58 ms
fontello.css
34 ms
main.min.css
107 ms
modernizr.js
167 ms
jquery.min.js
225 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
127 ms
main.min.js
354 ms
prum.min.js
88 ms
sitelio.png
65 ms
logo_sprite_hr.png
65 ms
arrow_dn_left.png
64 ms
arrow_dn.png
64 ms
arrow_left.png
64 ms
arrow_right.png
93 ms
slide_1.png
348 ms
slide_2.png
339 ms
slide_3.png
407 ms
business_2.jpg
359 ms
business_3.jpg
360 ms
arrow_dn_right.png
225 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
188 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
218 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
218 ms
analytics.js
161 ms
business_1.jpg
110 ms
linkid.js
11 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
57 ms
sitelio.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
sitelio.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sitelio.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitelio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitelio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitelio.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitelio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: