Tools & Wizards About Us
sitew.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sitew.de

Create a website: free, easy, professional website | SiteW

Page Load Speed

11.4 sec in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

10.4 sec

Page Rendered

859 ms

sitew.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SiteW content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sitew.de

Create a free website with SiteW! Easy-to-use and quick, SiteW is the easiest tool to create a website you love. Not to be missed!

Visit sitew.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitew.de page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitew.de performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitew.de

171 ms

www.sitew.de

167 ms

www.sitew.de

763 ms

WQHciA6TTzU

254 ms

base_de.png

8769 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Sitew.de, 26% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (7 requests) were made to Ssl.sitew.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.1 sec) relates to the external source Ssl.sitew.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 713.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sitew.de main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 200.2 kB

  • Original 324.3 kB
  • After minification 321.4 kB
  • After compression 124.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SiteW images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 150.8 kB

  • Original 275.0 kB
  • After minification 274.8 kB
  • After compression 124.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.8 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 362.5 kB

  • Original 432.8 kB
  • After minification 430.6 kB
  • After compression 70.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitew.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 362.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (64%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SiteW. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sitew.de

sitew.de

171 ms

www.sitew.de

www.sitew.de

167 ms

www.sitew.de

www.sitew.de

763 ms

WQHciA6TTzU

WQHciA6TTzU

254 ms

base_de.png

base_de.png

8769 ms

6fGwsnx_EXc

6fGwsnx_EXc

350 ms

editor_func_de.jpg

editor_func_de.jpg

9072 ms

css

css

246 ms

en-ef418a2ea46ce2d0aadc96bb25a3512d.gif

en-ef418a2ea46ce2d0aadc96bb25a3512d.gif

8591 ms

fr-77d036726f2d4e9ee7ca4be5dfdf64fe.gif

fr-77d036726f2d4e9ee7ca4be5dfdf64fe.gif

8589 ms

es-8123da68052732d85679a8bc5b4bdcf9.gif

es-8123da68052732d85679a8bc5b4bdcf9.gif

8589 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

257 ms

save_session

save_session

8624 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

247 ms

bg_top-17811111994ced37322e5ae11494cc44.jpg

bg_top-17811111994ced37322e5ae11494cc44.jpg

8997 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

147 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

228 ms

css

css

64 ms

css

css

37 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

94 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

3819 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

3831 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

3849 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

3899 ms

vzIUHo9z-oJ4WgkpPOtg1_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

vzIUHo9z-oJ4WgkpPOtg1_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

3913 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

3913 ms

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

3915 ms

7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

3914 ms

12mE4jfMSBTmg-81EiS-YRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

12mE4jfMSBTmg-81EiS-YRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

3912 ms

1pO9eUAp8pSF8VnRTP3xnvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

1pO9eUAp8pSF8VnRTP3xnvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

3912 ms

OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0YbN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0YbN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

3912 ms

t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

3913 ms

bmC0pGMXrhphrZJmniIZpYbN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

bmC0pGMXrhphrZJmniIZpYbN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff

3914 ms

tr

tr

3912 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

3879 ms

ec.js

ec.js

53 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

43 ms

WQHciA6TTzU

WQHciA6TTzU

3798 ms

collect

collect

3879 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

18 ms

collect

collect

3751 ms

collect

collect

125 ms

47 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

18 ms

25 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

24 ms

landing-fc5916785e5d98ceef7acf3a5e1b1f3c.css

landing-fc5916785e5d98ceef7acf3a5e1b1f3c.css

155 ms

Accessibility Review

sitew.de accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sitew.de best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sitew.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitew.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Sitew.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitew.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SiteW. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: