Tools & Wizards About Us
sitewater.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

sitewater.ru

Daddy Casino | Официальный сайт

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

968 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

540 ms

sitewater.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sitewater.ru homepage info - get ready to check Sitewater best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about sitewater.ru

Visit sitewater.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitewater.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 968 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitewater.ru performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitewater.ru

968 ms

script.js

96 ms

style.css

192 ms

pagenavi-css.css

189 ms

jquery.js

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Sitewater.ru, 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) relates to the external source Counter.yadro.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.4 kB (31%)

Content Size

735.4 kB

After Optimization

505.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sitewater.ru main page is 735.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 391.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 42.8 kB

  • Original 55.4 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 391.4 kB
  • After minification 373.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitewater images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 148.1 kB

  • Original 263.4 kB
  • After minification 261.3 kB
  • After compression 115.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 25.2 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitewater.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitewater. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sitewater.ru

sitewater.ru

968 ms

script.js

script.js

96 ms

style.css

style.css

192 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

189 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

287 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

190 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

196 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

4 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

logo

logo

3595 ms

Page-BgTexture.jpg

Page-BgTexture.jpg

3583 ms

PostDateIcon.png

PostDateIcon.png

3585 ms

PostAuthorIcon.png

PostAuthorIcon.png

3584 ms

irrigatsia_rosy-168x300.jpg

irrigatsia_rosy-168x300.jpg

3585 ms

PostCategoryIcon.png

PostCategoryIcon.png

3584 ms

PostTagIcon.png

PostTagIcon.png

3582 ms

PostCommentsIcon.png

PostCommentsIcon.png

3584 ms

vodopad_spain-168x300.jpg

vodopad_spain-168x300.jpg

3586 ms

Baikal_1739-300x187.jpg

Baikal_1739-300x187.jpg

3588 ms

thermal_water_sm.jpg

thermal_water_sm.jpg

3583 ms

water_diet_weight_loss_sm.jpg

water_diet_weight_loss_sm.jpg

3584 ms

water_swelling_pregnancy_sm.jpg

water_swelling_pregnancy_sm.jpg

3585 ms

alternating_douche_sm.jpg

alternating_douche_sm.jpg

3584 ms

water_vehicle_weight_loss_sm.jpg

water_vehicle_weight_loss_sm.jpg

3584 ms

saving_water_sm.jpg

saving_water_sm.jpg

3586 ms

vidy-vody-v-prirode-287x300.jpg

vidy-vody-v-prirode-287x300.jpg

3589 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

collect

collect

51 ms

hit

hit

3567 ms

watch.js

watch.js

3558 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

3505 ms

Sheet-s.png

Sheet-s.png

3515 ms

Sheet-h.png

Sheet-h.png

3516 ms

Sheet-v.png

Sheet-v.png

3516 ms

Header.jpg

Header.jpg

3524 ms

nav.png

nav.png

3517 ms

MenuItem.png

MenuItem.png

3519 ms

Block-s.png

Block-s.png

3519 ms

Block-h.png

Block-h.png

3520 ms

Block-v.png

Block-v.png

3521 ms

BlockHeader.png

BlockHeader.png

3520 ms

BlockHeaderIcon.png

BlockHeaderIcon.png

3521 ms

BlockContentBullets.png

BlockContentBullets.png

3521 ms

Button.png

Button.png

3522 ms

ca-pub-0742430965794164.js

ca-pub-0742430965794164.js

66 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

57 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

70 ms

rssIcon.png

rssIcon.png

207 ms

Footer.png

Footer.png

209 ms

watch.js

watch.js

469 ms

hit

hit

135 ms

ads

ads

237 ms

osd.js

osd.js

3 ms

11965839224092359854

11965839224092359854

40 ms

abg.js

abg.js

41 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

51 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

34 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

4 ms

s

s

24 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

2 ms

Accessibility Review

sitewater.ru accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

sitewater.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sitewater.ru SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitewater.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitewater.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitewater.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitewater. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: