Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

situm.com

Indoor Positioning

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

875 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

859 ms

situm.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to situm.com homepage info - get ready to check Situm best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about situm.com

Situm Indoor Positioning System to improve visitor experience and staff management with indoor navigation, indoor mapping & indoor tracking.

Visit situm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Situm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 875 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

situm.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,470 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

875 ms

gtm.js

93 ms

script.js

48 ms

style.min.css

129 ms

style-coblocks-1.css

212 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Situm.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (970 ms) belongs to the original domain Situm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 233.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Situm.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 209.2 kB

  • Original 253.2 kB
  • After minification 249.1 kB
  • After compression 44.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Situm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 34.2 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (72%)

Requests Now

118

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Situm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

situm.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

situm.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

situm.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Situm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Situm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Situm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: